Rescuing
Democracy in the United Kingdom from our current Elected
Dictatorship
|
Spin, not
face-to-face confrontations with the voters, is the Government's
chosen method of communication. Ordinary
people are dangerous. Ordinary people might ask a question
which throws a politician 'off message'; the Cabinet member
might reveal himself or herself to be a human being like
us, and not a programmed android. Worse still, he or she
might tell the truth.
Ann Leslie - Daily Mail, September
16, 2004
|
Is
it time to withdraw from the unelected South West assembly?
Cornwall
County Council to assess the pros and cons of withdrawing
By
Colin Gregory. West Briton, December 16, 2004
Officers
at Cornwall County Council are to assess the feasibility and implications
of withdrawing from the South West Regional Assembly. Some members
regard it as an irrelevant tier of government while others praise
the assembly for bringing millions of pounds to Cornwall for the
new university and medical school. This follows a motion proposed
to the council at its meeting in Truro by South-East Cornwall
Conservatives Sheryll Murray of Rame, and Armand Toms, of Looe.
The
motion stated that in view of the overwhelming rejection by the
electorate of the North East Regional Assembly, the county council
should ask its resource management to assess the feasibility and
implications of its withdrawal from the assembly.
Mrs
Murray said the assembly, whose 117 members include a dozen from
Cornwall, was primarily financed by central government and topped
up by local authorities. Cornwall's annual contribution to a body
costing around £4million/year to run, with a Taunton-based
staff now numbering 60, is £27,000, plus the travelling
expenses of its three delegates, Doris Ansari, David Roberts,
and Godfrey Smale.
The
council comprises council members from 51 local authorities in
the seven-county region and representatives of various sectors
deemed to have a role in its economic, social and environmental
well-being. It covers an area from Gloucestershire, Dorset and
Wiltshire to the Isles of Scilly and represents a population of
almost five million. Meetings are usually held in Exeter.
Among
the responsibilities handed down by the Government to the assembly
since it evolved in the late 1990's are scrutinising the South
West Regional Development Agency and, since September, regional
planning. Mrs Murray said: "With our county budget under
so much pressure over the next year, I feel it would be far more
prudent for Government to give its grant for the South West Regional
Assembly, an unelected body, to local authorities instead. The
salary bill of the assembly is £1.8million and has risen
by 15% this year. It now employs a full time staff of 60. I believe
some of that money should come to this council and be put to far
better use."
Mr
Smale replied that the Government and the Deputy Prime Minister,
John Prescott, had made it clear that the South West Regional
Assembly would not go away. He said the assembly was responsible
for monitoring the Regional Development Agency which had put many
millions of pounds Cornwall's way for projects like the Combined
Universities and the medical school.
Mr
Smale said: "We would not have had this money in a million
years from the Tories. In my view the assembly may bore some people
to tears, but it is doing a good job. The assembly is going to
continue whether or not Cornwall County Council withdraws. I think
we should be there."
Mr
Toms said: "The assembly is another tier of government, another
duplication, unrepresentative of our area and completely unnecessary."
Mrs
Val Cox said: "Given the huge implications of regional governance,
it would be sensible for this council's resource management committee
to look at both the feasibility and the implications of withdrawing
from the South West Regional Assembly."
For
the health of our democracy, we, the people of the United Kingdom,
must find a way to force Mr Blair to resign
Such
defiance of the democratic process and the will of the majority
of we people of the UK, must be exposed by voters as a matter
or urgency, and not just in the two by-elections we have had this
July and the European elections in June 2004. But how can this
be done?
The
most effective way of getting our deceitful PM to resign would
be to mobilise the army of Labour MPs currently in the House of
Commons and get them to demand it, the loss of their seat to be
a penalty if they did not. All voters in Labour-held constituencies
need to write a letter along these lines to their local Labour
MPs:
|
Dear
Despite
his absolute and unequivocal assurances over the past year
of the serious risk to our security of Saddam Hussein's
'weapons of mass destruction', Prime Minister Blair
has admitted, that the threat was non-existent. For that
critical error of judgement and for his gross incompetence
in handling this very important issue, I ask you to take
immediate steps to ensure that Tony Blair does the honourable
thing and resign without delay..
I
would therefore be much obliged if you would propose and
help mobilise a Parliamentary vote of 'No Confidence' in
Mr Blair which, despite Labour's huge majority, would leave
the PM with no option but to resign.
If
I get no reply to this letter, I shall assume you will continue
to support Mr Blair as our Prime Minister. In such circumstances
I shall not vote for you in the forthcoming General Election.
Signed:
|
Simple,
non-violent, protest letters along these lines on a variety of
issues could be the basis for re-vitalising our democracy and
increasing voters' interest and participation in politics. Download
a printable copy of the above letter here.
There
is another way for the voice of the silent majority to be heard,
a voice that made sure broken promises would not only be revealed,
but punished in subsequent elections.
In
the year available before the General Election expected in 2005,
many topics are available as ammunition, each one asking questions.
A weapon for our purpose will be the results of Opinion Polls
in individual constituencies using ICM, NOP, Gallop, Mori
or YouGov.
Questions
suggested for this purpose are listed here.
CAST
YOUR VOTE ON A VARIETY OF OTHER IMPORTANT ISSUES HERE.
Current
and prospective Parliamentary candidates of all Parties running
for election could share a platform at public forums in every
constituency. They would be presented with the results of
polls on this issue expressed by the majority of voters in that
constituency.
The candidates could be asked if their own views and that of their
Party manifesto corresponded with the polls, and if not, how they
intended to represent the will of the majority of local voters.
Local and National Press, Radio and TV coverage would be arranged
and the results published on this web site.
Here
is another powerful strategy for using your vote effectively in
the forthcoming General Election. Send your sitting and prospective
MPs a letter defining your requirements if they want your vote.
This example deals with the proposed
EU Constitutional Treaty.
Your
letters would end: "If you do not answer
this letter, I shall take it that you intend to follow the Government
line. I shall act accordingly in the forthcoming General Election.
Or
why not create a questionnaire that you send to all the candidates
in your constituency, getting them to give yes/no answers to questions
of your choice, and ending it with the same paragraph(above).
Download
a printable example of the questionnaire.
It
is high time for the people of this United Kingdom to stop allowing
themselves to be manipulated by politicians. We need our representatives
in Parliament to genuinely reflect the view of the majority in
their own constituency, even if this means going against their
personal and/or their party's policy. While they may argue their
case, hoping to change the minds of the majority in their constituency,
they should ultimately be obliged to reflect the majority view
of those who elect them.
It
will be argued by politicians of all parties that most voters
don't have the knowledge necessary to express an opinion on important
subjects at issue, and that our vote is a form of delegated democracy.
We should argue that it is their duty to ensure that we voters
do have ready access to such information as is necessary to form
an intelligent opinion. That, after all, is one main purpose of
Opposition Parties in our Parliamentary Democracy.
Most
important of all, such proceedings would rekindle in voters their
latent interest and obligation to cast their vote, knowing that
the candidate of their choice would be more likely to act in accordance
with their wishes. A much higher turnout in elections would be
the result.
Contact
your local Party Chairman. Gain his support for setting up public
forums in your constituency on these, as well as any other relevant
topics, well before the next General Election expected in 2005.
You should then, depending on the integrity of the candidate of
your choice, feel fairly certain that your view on any subject
being debated in Parliament will more accurately be reflected
by your representative in that assembly.
