Silent
Majority Speaks
Rescuing
Democracy in the United Kingdom from our current Elected
Dictatorship
|
Spin, not
face-to-face confrontations with the voters, is the Government's
chosen method of communication. Ordinary
people are dangerous. Ordinary people might ask a question
which throws a politician 'off message'; the Cabinet member
might reveal himself or herself to be a human being like
us, and not a programmed android. Worse still, he or she
might tell the truth.
Ann Leslie - Daily Mail, September
16, 2004
|
Overview
of Nuclear Energy
The main use of nuclear
energy is to generate electricity. This is simply a clean and efficient
way of boiling water to make steam which drives turbine generators.
Except for the reactor itself, a nuclear power station works like
most coal or gas-fired power stations. Nuclear energy is best applied
to medium and large-scale electricity generation on a continuous
basis (ie meeting "base-load" demand). The fuel for it is basically
uranium.
Why use nuclear
energy to make the steam? Because it is clean, safe, and usually
cost-competitive. Originally it was because it was seen as more
convenient and probably cheaper than alternatives, fossil fuel such
as coal, gas and oil. That was when the technology was first developed
for harnessing the power of the atom in a safe and controlled manner,
in the 1950s. Since then the question of sustainability has emerged,
giving rise to a more sophisticated rationale.
Nuclear energy has
distinct environmental advantages over fossil fuels, in that virtually
all its wastes are contained and managed - nuclear power stations
do not cause any pollution. The fuel for nuclear power is virtually
unlimited, considering both geological and technological aspects.
That is to say, there is plenty of uranium in the earth's crust
and furthermore, well-proven (but not yet fully economic) technology
means that we can extract about 60 times as much energy from it
as we do today. The safety record of nuclear
energy is better than for any major industrial technology.
Nuclear energy supplies
over 16% of the world's electricity, more than the world used from
all sources in 1960. Today 31 countries use nuclear energy to generate
up to three quarters of their electricity, and a substantial number
of these depend on it for one quarter to one half of their supply.
Some 10,500 reactor years of operational experience have been accumulated
since the 1950s by the world's 440 nuclear power reactors (and nuclear
reactors powering naval vessels have clocked up a similar amount).
Visit this web
site for detailed answers to questions of safety, economics, waste
management, transport of nuclear materials, radiation, and avoiding
weapons proliferation. They are all addressed in some detail. A few
introductory notes are set out below.
Safety
From the outset,
safety of nuclear reactors has been a very high priority in their
design and engineering. About one third of the cost of a typical
reactor is due to safety systems and structures. The Chernobyl accident
in 1986 was a reminder of the importance of this, whereas the Three
Mile Island accident in 1979 showed that conventional safety systems
work.
At Chernobyl in
Ukraine 30 people were killed (mostly by high levels of radiation)
and many more injured or adversely affected. This reactor lacked
the basic engineering provisions necessary for licensing in most
parts of the world (other reactors of that kind still operating
have been significantly modified). At Three
Mile Island in the USA with a similarly serious malfunction, the
effects were contained and no-one suffered any harm or injury.
Economics
Nuclear power reactors
are expensive to build but relatively cheap to operate. Their competitiveness
economically thus depends on keeping construction to schedule so
that capital costs do not blow out, and then operating them at reasonably
high capacity over many years. By way of contrast, gas-fired power
plants are very cheap and quick to build, but relatively very expensive
to operate due to the cost of their fuel. With
rising gas prices, and the high cost of moving coal long distances,
nuclear plants are generally competitive with both gas and coal
in most parts of the world, and becoming more so.
Wastes
Nuclear power produces
wastes which are contained and managed, with the cost of this being
met by the electricity customer at the time. It does not produce
any significant wastes which are dispersed to the environment. It
therefore avoids contributing to increased carbon dioxide levels
in the atmosphere.
The main wastes
produced by "burning" uranium in a nuclear reactor are very hot
and radioactive, placing them among the most unpleasant wastes from
modern industry. However, these "high-level" nuclear wastes are
modest in quantity. Handling and storing them safely is quite straightforward,
they simply need to be shielded from human exposure, and cooled.
Shielding can be by water, concrete, steel or other dense material,
cooling is by air or water. For instance, when spent fuel is removed
from a typical reactor, it is done under water and the spent fuel
is transferred to a large storage pool where it may remain for up
to 50 years.
About 30 kg of spent
fuel arises each year in generating enough electricity for about
1000 people in the western world. The management and disposal of
these wastes is funded from the time they are generated.
Other radioactive
wastes also arise from the nuclear fuel cycle, these have greater
volume but are more easily handled and disposed of. One characteristic
of all radioactive wastes which distinguishes them from the very
mauch larger amount of other industrial wastes is that their radioactivity
progressively decays and diminishes. For instance, after
40 years, the spent fuel removed from a reactor has only one thousandth
of its initial radioactivity remaining, making it very much easier
to handle and dispose of.
Transport
of nuclear materials.
Safety is the prime
requirement with nuclear transports, particularly those of highly-radioactive
spent fuel, and the record is impressive. Shielding, and the security
of that shielding in any accident, is the key with any nuclear materials,
especially those which are significantly radioactive. There has
never been any radiation release from an accident involving such
materials. For instance, spent fuel is shipped in large and extremely
robust steel casks weighing over 100 tonnes, and each holding only
about 6 tonnes of fuel.
Radiation.
Ionising radiation
from uranium ores and nuclear wastes is part of our human environment,
and always has been so. At high levels it is hazardous, but at low
levels it is harmless. Considerable effort is devoted to ensuring
that those working with nuclear power are not exposed to harmful
levels of radiation from it, and standards for the general public
are set about 20 times lower still, well below the levels normally
experienced by any of us from natural sources.
Avoiding
weapons proliferation.
The initial development
of atomic energy during and immediately after the second world war
was to produce bombs. An early concern when the atom was harnessed
for controlled civil use was that this nuclear power should not
enable more countries to acquire nuclear weapons. Through the United
Nations, procedures were set up to ensure this, and in fact they
have been perhaps the most conspicuous success of that body. No
nuclear materials such as uranium from the civil nuclear fuel cycle
have ever been diverted to make weapons. In fact today the whole
picture is reversed in that a lot of military
uranium is being brought into the civil nuclear fuel cycle to make
electricity, which is widely seen as a positive development, unimaginable
40 years ago. One tenth of US electricity is made from Russian military
warheads.
Other
uses
Although this web
site focuses on the use of nuclear energy to produce electricity,
it is important to note that nuclear energy is also used to produce
the radioisotopes used in many parts of our modern world, with health
services, industry and even domestic safety very dependent on them.
Many homes have smoke detectors which depend on a tiny amount of
americium, derived from plutonium made in a nuclear reactor. In
the developed countries, about one half of all people will depend
on nuclear medicine at some stage of their lives.


This web site is still
under construction. If you have suggestions for additional subjects,
or material to include in the pages linked to the subjects listed,
please contact the webmaster.
|