Rescuing
Democracy in the United Kingdom from our current Elected
Dictatorship
|
Spin, not
face-to-face confrontations with the voters, is the Government's
chosen method of communication. Ordinary
people are dangerous. Ordinary people might ask a question
which throws a politician 'off message'; the Cabinet member
might reveal himself or herself to be a human being like
us, and not a programmed android. Worse still, he or she
might tell the truth.
Ann Leslie - Daily Mail, September
16, 2004
|
|
After a clear
vote against them, we still got eight non-elected Regional
Assemblies. When we vote against the EU Constitution, we'll
get them anyway.
Letter from P.Cove, Aylesbury, BUCKS.-
Daily Mail, January 31, 2005
|
This
systematic pattern of deceit - Comment - Daily
Mail, January 27, 2005
The
question is straightforward, the issue clear. Should
the United Kingdom approve the treaty establishing a constitution
for the European Union? The
terms on which the referendum battle will be fought seems a model
of fairness, paying the way to serious, honest debate on arguably
the most crucial decision voters will ever take.
Yet
behind this appearance of evenhandedness lies an ugly reality:
that in matters European (as in so many other things) New Labour
is incapable of rising above mendacity, misinformation and bad
faith. And now it has been caught out once again in a systematic
pattern of deceit.
In
negotiations on the constitution, Mr Blair claimed there were
'red lines' that would never be surrendered, points of principle
he would defend to the very last. Among them, he insisted, was
this country's right to determine its own asylum and immigration
policies. Indeed, only three months ago he was assuring us that
Britain still has 'complete control' over immigration. But he
wasn't telling the truth. And we know he was peddling porkies
because Brussels has let the cat out of the bag.
This
week, the Commission reacted with outrage to the new Tory policy
limiting immigration., It issued a diktat warning Michael Howard
that his proposals would be illegal under EU law. In doing so
it offered a deeply depressing insight into the way this Government
behaves.
Leave
aside the offensive way unelected, unaccountable eurocrats presume
to interfere in an issue that should be decided by British voters
and nobody else. What is even more disturbing is that Downing
Street has been forced to admit that while Mr Blair was boasting
about his 'red lines' he was stealthily signing away our right
to curb immigration.
Not
only has he accepted EU directives creating a common asylum system,
but last October he actually gave away our veto
on immigration and border control policies - a hugely significant
decision, but one that has never been properly explained to Parliament
or the public.
But
then, why should anyone be remotely surprised? From the very beginning,
New Labour's approach has been marked by slithery dishonesty.
Remember the ludicrous claim that the constitution was only a
'tidying up exercise'? And the grubby pretence that the Charter
of Fundamental Rights has no more legal validity than the Beano?
None
of this bodes well for the coming referendum campaign. For this
constitution doesn't simply involve a massive loss of national
independence over immigration,. It will strip us of power to control
our economy, defence, foreign policy, criminal justice and much
else besides - all deeply contentious issues which New Labour
is desperate to fudge.
Honest
debate? If only. On an issue of huge national importance, the
tragedy is that not a word this Prime Minister or Government says
can be believed.
For
the health of our democracy, we, the people of the United Kingdom,
must find a way to force Mr Blair to resign
Such
defiance of the democratic process and the will of the majority
of we people of the UK, must be exposed by voters as a matter
or urgency, and not just in the two by-elections we have had this
July and the European elections in June 2004. But how can this
be done?
The
most effective way of getting our deceitful PM to resign would
be to mobilise the army of Labour MPs currently in the House of
Commons and get them to demand it, the loss of their seat to be
a penalty if they did not. All voters in Labour-held constituencies
need to write a letter along these lines to their local Labour
MPs:
|
Dear
Despite
his absolute and unequivocal assurances over the past year
of the serious risk to our security of Saddam Hussein's
'weapons of mass destruction', Prime Minister Blair
has admitted, that the threat was non-existent. For that
critical error of judgement and for his gross incompetence
in handling this very important issue, I ask you to take
immediate steps to ensure that Tony Blair does the honourable
thing and resign without delay..
I
would therefore be much obliged if you would propose and
help mobilise a Parliamentary vote of 'No Confidence' in
Mr Blair which, despite Labour's huge majority, would leave
the PM with no option but to resign.
If
I get no reply to this letter, I shall assume you will continue
to support Mr Blair as our Prime Minister. In such circumstances
I shall not vote for you in the forthcoming General Election.
Signed:
|
Simple,
non-violent, protest letters along these lines on a variety of
issues could be the basis for re-vitalising our democracy and
increasing voters' interest and participation in politics. Download
a printable copy of the above letter here.
There
is another way for the voice of the silent majority to be heard,
a voice that made sure broken promises would not only be revealed,
but punished in subsequent elections.
In
the year available before the General Election expected in 2005,
many topics are available as ammunition, each one asking questions.
A weapon for our purpose will be the results of Opinion Polls
in individual constituencies using ICM, NOP, Gallop, Mori
or YouGov.
Questions
suggested for this purpose are listed here.
CAST
YOUR VOTE ON A VARIETY OF OTHER IMPORTANT ISSUES HERE.
Current
and prospective Parliamentary candidates of all Parties running
for election could share a platform at public forums in every
constituency. They would be presented with the results of
polls on this issue expressed by the majority of voters in that
constituency.
The candidates could be asked if their own views and that of their
Party manifesto corresponded with the polls, and if not, how they
intended to represent the will of the majority of local voters.
Local and National Press, Radio and TV coverage would be arranged
and the results published on this web site.
Here
is another powerful strategy for using your vote effectively in
the forthcoming General Election. Send your sitting and prospective
MPs a letter defining your requirements if they want your vote.
This example deals with the proposed
EU Constitutional Treaty.
Your
letters would end: "If you do not answer
this letter, I shall take it that you intend to follow the Government
line. I shall act accordingly in the forthcoming General Election.
Or
why not create a questionnaire that you send to all the candidates
in your constituency, getting them to give yes/no answers to questions
of your choice, and ending it with the same paragraph(above).
Download
a printable example of the questionnaire.
It
is high time for the people of this United Kingdom to stop allowing
themselves to be manipulated by politicians. We need our representatives
in Parliament to genuinely reflect the view of the majority in
their own constituency, even if this means going against their
personal and/or their party's policy. While they may argue their
case, hoping to change the minds of the majority in their constituency,
they should ultimately be obliged to reflect the majority view
of those who elect them.
It
will be argued by politicians of all parties that most voters
don't have the knowledge necessary to express an opinion on important
subjects at issue, and that our vote is a form of delegated democracy.
We should argue that it is their duty to ensure that we voters
do have ready access to such information as is necessary to form
an intelligent opinion. That, after all, is one main purpose of
Opposition Parties in our Parliamentary Democracy.
Most
important of all, such proceedings would rekindle in voters their
latent interest and obligation to cast their vote, knowing that
the candidate of their choice would be more likely to act in accordance
with their wishes. A much higher turnout in elections would be
the result.
Contact
your local Party Chairman. Gain his support for setting up public
forums in your constituency on these, as well as any other relevant
topics, well before the next General Election expected in 2005.
You should then, depending on the integrity of the candidate of
your choice, feel fairly certain that your view on any subject
being debated in Parliament will more accurately be reflected
by your representative in that assembly.
