Rescuing
Democracy in the United Kingdom from our current Elected
Dictatorship
|
Spin, not
face-to-face confrontations with the voters, is the Government's
chosen method of communication. Ordinary
people are dangerous. Ordinary people might ask a question
which throws a politician 'off message'; the Cabinet member
might reveal himself or herself to be a human being like
us, and not a programmed android. Worse still, he or she
might tell the truth.
Ann Leslie - Daily Mail, September
16, 2004
|
|
Letter from P.Cove, Aylesbury, BUCKS.-
Daily Mail, January 31, 2005
After a clear
vote against them, we still got eight non-elected Regional
Assemblies. When we vote against the EU Constitution,
we'll get them anyway.
|
Conservatives
will bring NHS dentistry back to the high street
Conservative
Shadow Health Secretary, Andrew Lansley, has set out the Conservative
dentistry policy. This includes plans to increase the number of
dentists and professionals complementary to dentistry, exempt
over-75s from charges and extending exemptions for children up
until to the age 21 for those who follow good oral health promotion,
as well as giving non exempt adults the option for a voluntary
low-cost monthly payment scheme as an alternative to pay as you
go.
Speaking
to Conservatvies.com about the policy, Mr Lansley said: "Five
years ago Mr Blair promised everyone would have access to an NHS
dentist within two years. But this was all talk. Today, fewer
people are registered with an NHS dentist than 7 years ago."
He
added: "The Conservatives' policy will bring NHS dentists
back to the high street. It offers patients access to their dentist
either free of all charges or on an affordable basis. It gives
dentists a solid incentive to offer NHS dentistry geared to preventative
programmes for good oral health."
Andrew
Lansley CBE MP - 27/01/2005
Tory
pledge to fill NHS dentist shortage - one in every high street
- Daily
Mail - January 29, 2005
An
NHS dentist would return to every high street under Tory plans
unveiled last night. Patients would be given the option of paying
£10 monthly to cover all treatment instead of individual
bills. Conservatives would also extend free treatment for the
over-75's and under-21's, in a move costing £50 million
a year.
Unveiling
the Tory proposals, Tory health spokesman Andrew Lansley accused
the Government of breaking its promises on dentistry. He referred
to Tony Blair's pledge at the 1999 Labour Party conference that
'everyone within the next two years will be able once again to
see an NHS denstist'.
MrLansley
said: "Today, fewer people are registered with an NHS dentist
than seven years ago. The Conservatives' policy will bring NHS
dentists back to the high street. It offers patients access to
their dentist either free of all charges or on an affordable basis."
Dentists
would be paid according to the number of NHS patients on their
books. The current shortage of NHS dentists is estimated at 3000.
A
spokesman for the British Dental Association said: "The BDA
broadly support many of the under-pinning pillars that the Conservative
action plan is built upon."
A
Labour spokesman said: "Will they guarantee people will see
a dentist if they pay the dental charge?"
For
the health of our democracy, we, the people of the United Kingdom,
must find a way to force Mr Blair to resign
Such
defiance of the democratic process and the will of the majority
of we people of the UK, must be exposed by voters as a matter
or urgency, and not just in the two by-elections we have had this
July and the European elections in June 2004. But how can this
be done?
The
most effective way of getting our deceitful PM to resign would
be to mobilise the army of Labour MPs currently in the House of
Commons and get them to demand it, the loss of their seat to be
a penalty if they did not. All voters in Labour-held constituencies
need to write a letter along these lines to their local Labour
MPs:
|
Dear
Despite
his absolute and unequivocal assurances over the past year
of the serious risk to our security of Saddam Hussein's
'weapons of mass destruction', Prime Minister Blair
has admitted, that the threat was non-existent. For that
critical error of judgement and for his gross incompetence
in handling this very important issue, I ask you to take
immediate steps to ensure that Tony Blair does the honourable
thing and resign without delay..
I
would therefore be much obliged if you would propose and
help mobilise a Parliamentary vote of 'No Confidence' in
Mr Blair which, despite Labour's huge majority, would leave
the PM with no option but to resign.
If
I get no reply to this letter, I shall assume you will continue
to support Mr Blair as our Prime Minister. In such circumstances
I shall not vote for you in the forthcoming General Election.
Signed:
|
Simple,
non-violent, protest letters along these lines on a variety of
issues could be the basis for re-vitalising our democracy and
increasing voters' interest and participation in politics. Download
a printable copy of the above letter here.
There
is another way for the voice of the silent majority to be heard,
a voice that made sure broken promises would not only be revealed,
but punished in subsequent elections.
In
the year available before the General Election expected in 2005,
many topics are available as ammunition, each one asking questions.
A weapon for our purpose will be the results of Opinion Polls
in individual constituencies using ICM, NOP, Gallop, Mori
or YouGov.
Questions
suggested for this purpose are listed here.
CAST
YOUR VOTE ON A VARIETY OF OTHER IMPORTANT ISSUES HERE.
Current
and prospective Parliamentary candidates of all Parties running
for election could share a platform at public forums in every
constituency. They would be presented with the results of
polls on this issue expressed by the majority of voters in that
constituency.
The candidates could be asked if their own views and that of their
Party manifesto corresponded with the polls, and if not, how they
intended to represent the will of the majority of local voters.
Local and National Press, Radio and TV coverage would be arranged
and the results published on this web site.
Here
is another powerful strategy for using your vote effectively in
the forthcoming General Election. Send your sitting and prospective
MPs a letter defining your requirements if they want your vote.
This example deals with the proposed
EU Constitutional Treaty.
Your
letters would end: "If you do not answer
this letter, I shall take it that you intend to follow the Government
line. I shall act accordingly in the forthcoming General Election.
Or
why not create a questionnaire that you send to all the candidates
in your constituency, getting them to give yes/no answers to questions
of your choice, and ending it with the same paragraph(above).
Download
a printable example of the questionnaire.
It
is high time for the people of this United Kingdom to stop allowing
themselves to be manipulated by politicians. We need our representatives
in Parliament to genuinely reflect the view of the majority in
their own constituency, even if this means going against their
personal and/or their party's policy. While they may argue their
case, hoping to change the minds of the majority in their constituency,
they should ultimately be obliged to reflect the majority view
of those who elect them.
It
will be argued by politicians of all parties that most voters
don't have the knowledge necessary to express an opinion on important
subjects at issue, and that our vote is a form of delegated democracy.
We should argue that it is their duty to ensure that we voters
do have ready access to such information as is necessary to form
an intelligent opinion. That, after all, is one main purpose of
Opposition Parties in our Parliamentary Democracy.
Most
important of all, such proceedings would rekindle in voters their
latent interest and obligation to cast their vote, knowing that
the candidate of their choice would be more likely to act in accordance
with their wishes. A much higher turnout in elections would be
the result.
Contact
your local Party Chairman. Gain his support for setting up public
forums in your constituency on these, as well as any other relevant
topics, well before the next General Election expected in 2005.
You should then, depending on the integrity of the candidate of
your choice, feel fairly certain that your view on any subject
being debated in Parliament will more accurately be reflected
by your representative in that assembly.