the people

Silent Majority Speaks

Rescuing Democracy in the United Kingdom from our current Elected Dictatorship

Spin, not face-to-face confrontations with the voters, is the Government's chosen method of communication. Ordinary people are dangerous. Ordinary people might ask a question which throws a politician 'off message'; the Cabinet member might reveal himself or herself to be a human being like us, and not a programmed android. Worse still, he or she might tell the truth.

Ann Leslie - Daily Mail, September 16, 2004

 
Google
WWW silentmajorityspeaks.com

STOP PRESS

Is New Labour really listening?

Alex Brummer - City Editor, Daily Mail, May 18, 2005

The government and business appear to be engaged in a dialogue of the deaf. The Queen's Speech, which sets out the Government's legislative programme, is filled with proposals that are anathema to a free-market economy notably for flexible working hours and extended maternity leave.

Although Gordon Brown sought to soften the blow by promising to resist Europe's 48-hour week, such measures undermine the basic reforms to the labour and jobs market, which were the essence of the Thatcher revolution. The reforms are among reasons by Britain has enjoyed more than 50 quarters of consecutive growth dating back to 1992 - and this at a time when our European competitors are struggling in the slipstream.

Indeed, the government risks giving up its competitive advantage at a time when productivity in Britain still lags behind that of most of our Group of Seven neighbours. All of this has far-reaching consequences. The creation of 900,000 jobs in the public sector, as John Sunderland, the CBI president pointed out last night, has done little to create an efficient society.

The review by Sir Peter Gershon has not been used as a path to more effective and modern delivery by government but instead is seen as a mechanism for replacing one group of public-sector workers with another. There is much talk of the need to combat the threat to Britain from China and India. We are told that this nation needs to move up the skills ladder. But even in research and development we are being left behind.

Marconi has acknowledged that it is shifting not just manufacturing but some R&D to it new partner in China, Huawei - incidentally one of the winners from BT's £10bn contract for its 21st Century network. The shrinkage of business and the increasing burden of regulation, costed at £39bn by the British chambers of Commerce, is also among the factors holding back share price recovery after the dramatic falls in the 2000 and 2002 bear market, which saw values plunge by 41,9%.

Recovery is still some way off and will remain so if business confidence is subverted. That will have serious consequences for savings, investment and pensions, - the biggest challenge of all in Labour's third term.

CBI President attacks Brown over 'non-jobs'

By Paul Eastham, Deputy Political Editor - Daily Mail, May 18, 2005

Gordon Brown was attacked by a business leader last night for spending millions of pounds of tax-payers' money on 'gender and diversity observers' rather than doctors, nurses and police.

Dangerous trend

Comment - Daily Mail, May 18, 2005

In two compelling questions, the president of the CBI exposes a deeply disturbing imbalance in Britain.

How many of the nearly 900,000 jobs created in the public sector since 1997 were doctors, nurses, police? How many were target setters, gender and diversity observers and outreach specialists?

But of course John Sunderland already knew the answers. Only one sixth of the new public sector posts are in the front line. The others are 'non-jobs' which burden the productive part of our economy without offering value in return.

So will the Government be shamed into changing its profligacy over the public payroll? Don't hold your breath, when it works so much to Labour's advantage.

In Wales and the North East, for example, public spending is 60% of local GDP - about the same as in Hungary under Communism. In the Midlands, the figure is 40%. And as the election showed, these are the areas where Labour does best.

Yes, some places need extra help. But in whole swathes of the country a client electorate is emerging, understandably reluctant to vote for efficiency in the public sector because it would mean losing jobs. That is not only unhealthy for regions that are increasingly dependent on state spending. It is unhealthy for Britain too.

CBI President John Sunderland said the vast expansion of state 'non-jobs' meant business was entering 'a critical era' in its relationship with the Government. With the Labour Chancellor sitting uncomfortably alongside, Mr Sunderland said New Labour had hired 900,000 extra public sector workers since 1997, yet productivity in state services had slumped.

Only a sixth of the new jobs could be readily identified as front-line public service staff, such as nurses, teachers, and police officers, according to one survey by City Firm William's de Broe. At last night's CBI annual dinner in London, Mr Sunderland urged the Chancellor to ensure tax revenues were being spent well.

He said: "If you take the money, please spend it well. Ensure it produces real improvements in people's lives. How many of the nearly 900,000 jobs that have been created in the public sector since 1997 were extra doctors, nurses, police? How many were target setters, target checkers, gender and diversity observers and outreach specialists?"

Mr Sunderland, 58, who is chairmen of confectionery group Cadbury Schweppes, went on: "You have assured business that you have no intention of adding further to the significant taxation burdens which have already been imposed on business over the past eight years - an incremental £43 billion. Be certain, we'll hold you to that assurance. We still provide most of the jobs, most of the taxes which fund out public services and all the profits which support our pension funds and savings. It is therefore an essential responsibility of Government to nurture business and the profits its generates."

Last night, the Chancellor's spokesman said Mr Sunderland's figure for the number of extra public sector workers was wrong. He was using government statistics - but one's for health, education and public administration workers which include 'a significant amount of private sector employment', the spokesman said.

He said the Government had hired a large number of extra front-line staff since 1997, including 32,500 teachers, 86,000 teaching assistants, 77,000 nurses, 19,000 doctors, and more than 13,000 police officers.

Is New Labour really listening?

PLEASE  LEAVE  YOUR  MESSAGE  HERE

READ  YOUR  LETTERS

If you have suggestions for additional subjects, or material to include in the pages linked to the subjects listed, please contact the webmaster.

 

 

 

 

Polling Booth
NHS Dentists
Al Queda/Iraq
Blair or Bliar?
Tax and Waste
Votes at 16
Prisoners' Votes
Green Field Sites
Power
Transport
EU Constitution
MMR Vaccine
N H S
Schools
Top-up Fees
Fisheries Policy
Pensions
Immigration
Asylum 
Scottish MPs
Rgnl Assembly 
Fox Hunting
G M Foods
H I V
Al Queda/Iraq
Blair or Bliar?
I D Cards
HOME
PLEASE  LEAVE  YOUR  MESSAGE  HERE