Silent
Majority Speaks
Rescuing
Democracy in the United Kingdom from our current Elected
Dictatorship
|
Spin,
not face-to-face confrontations with the voters, is the
Government's chosen method of communication.Ordinary
people might ask a question which throws a politician 'off
message'; the Cabinet member might reveal himself or herself
to be a human being like us, and not a programmed android.
Worse still, he or she might tell the truth. Ann
Leslie - Daily Mail, September 16, 2004
Simon
Heffer is right; only a damn good thrashing will teach school
bullies that violence and intimidation have no place in
civilised society. Phil Musk, Godalming,
Surrey - Daily Mail 24/2/2005
|
Schools
need books, not pregnancy kits for girls
Plans
for pregnancy testing for 11-year-olds at Leon Schol only
confirm the stupidity of the headmaster and governors
there. Although we live in Bletchley, I made sure my son
was educated in Aylesbury as our local schools have such
an appalling academic record.
The
headmaster should be concentrating on raising the standards
of education and moral values, not dishing out pregnancy
testing kits. the money spent on these could instead by
used to buy more books and hire teachers who can inspire
the children to learn.
The
law states that it is illegal for anyone under 16 to have
sexual intercourse and this, as well as the dangers of
sexually transmitted diseases, should be drummed into
young heads. The Leon School headmaster's actions condone
promiscuity and help young girls perpetuate the cycle
of unmarried mothers' dependant on the state.
Letter from Mrs. A Farrell, of Bletchley, Bucks. - Daily
Mail 17/11/2005
|
25%
of secondary pupils 'coast' in class
Sure
Start plan to help needy children is 'a £1bn disaster'
Banning
the cane did for discipline, say parents
Wrong
to close grammar schools, admits Blair's education guru, Lord
Adonis
Ruth
Kelly and Assisted Places Scheme
Labour's
U-turn on direct grant schools
A
lesson for us all
How
Labour's schools policy has betrayed a generation, by Blair's
teacher
Hain's
class war
Marriage
still best way to raise children
The
untouchables
Has
Labour's £17billion extra done any good for schools?
Pupils
resit maths A-levels six times
Schools
lose £1bn a year to town hall bureaucrats
Snap
inspections fail more schools
Children
'lagging three years behind those of the 1990s'
Selection
is the ONLY way to save our schools
How
many sex offenders in schools? No idea
Bring
back school blazers!
Prescott
wants to make sure if one kid can't have it, nobody else will
get it
Prescott
wages class war over Tony Blair's school reforms
Four
out of ten leave primary school without three Rs
Sex
education policy is a disaster
Can
we ALL learn to love our great heritage?
Coursework?
Abolish it!
State
schools let down their brightest pupils, says study
How
Labour got it wrong on truancy
Labour
bent the truth on college places
Betrayal
of Primary Pupils
How
the war on grammars deepened the class divide
More
exams, less education says Anthony Seldon, Headmaster of Brighton
College
Social
mobility has declined under New Labour
Great
teen pregnancy fiasco
Losers
in classroom warfare - 700,000
pupils a year play truant
Education
- Labour's terrible betrayal
CLASSROOM
CHAOS -
".. mob rule in corridors, gangs running riot. I gave
detention to a child and that afternoon I went out to find my
tyres let down and a note saying next time my brakes would be
cut "
One
million illiterate kids-- how many more will it take before this
pernicious ideology is destroyed?
How
schools are losing the war on the trouble-makers
Collapse
of the classrooms as hooligans win power struggle
Kelly
backs down on their own plan to foist yobs on best schools
- and
the Tories' £200m scheme to hive off problem pupils
School
gets 100% pass rate in maths and English. So what does Ofsted
to? Attacks it for concentrating on the 3Rs! Read
about it.
2004
Teenage truancy is now 50%
greater than in 1997, when Labour pledged to cut truancy by 33%
Studies
show there is now little difference in the cost of educating state
and independent children. Much of the cash destined for state
pupils is swallowed up in Whitehall and local Authority red tape.
Killed
by kindness by
James Bartholemew, Daily Mail, November 23, 2004.
Few
people today have any idea how widespread and rigorous
education was before the great state takeover that Lloyd
George himself set in motion as Prime Minister.
By
1860, when Britain was far poorer than it is today, at
least 95% of children attended schools for between 5 and
7 years. What is more, their numbers and the length of
time they attended were rapidly increasing.
This
was all achieved without any significant government help.
Most of the burden was shouldered by church schools like
one attended by Lloyd George, but there were also commercial
schools run on purely business lines.
According
to census statistics there were 3,754 of these private
schools in 1860 - and they educated every-one, not just
the rich, accounting for about a quarter of all working
class children in elementary school.
Poorer
parents liked these schools because they were flexible
and responsive to their wishes. Children spent their time
on subjects which the parents wanted, rather than being
taught what their middle class 'superiors' thought was
good for them. Schools would accommodate hard-pressed
families that needed their offspring at home for certain
times of the day or year.
As
a result, the parents did not feel patronised or resentful.
Education was something the showed their commitment to
by paying for, and in return it was under their control.
This
was a nation with booming private education that was racing
towards universal literacy.
Yet,
today, over a century later, the Department for Education
and Skills says that one in five adults is 'functionally
illiterate'. This is quite astonishing admission for a
welfare state to make about itself. It can only be regarded
as failure on a spectacular basis. After 11 long years
in the state educational system, 20% of children today
are emerging unable to read.
"The
Welfare State we're in" by James Bartholomew (Politico
-£18.99)
|
More parents
are opting for private school orgrammars
Report
by Sarah Harris, Education Correspondent, Daily Mail, May 26, 2004
Half
of parents would send their children to private school if they could
afford it, a survey has revealed. They also back entrance exams
to State Secondary Schools - signalling a demand for the 11 plus.
The findings
of the Mori survey will be a blow to Education Secretary Charles
Clarke, as they show private and grammar schools are more popular
than ever among families. This is despite Mr Clarke's insistence
that grammars are no better than comprehensives.
The study,
commissioning by education charity The Sutton Trust, surveyed 644
parents across the country. Only 36% of them disagreed with academic
selection at 11. But half believed pupils of differing academic
ability should be selected either to private or state secondary
schools on the basis of how well they do in entrance tests.
Fifty
percent would also probably or definitely switch to the independent
sector if they had the money. Only 15% said they definitely would
not. And almost half believed that children should have the opportunity
to go to private school at the expense of the Government regardless
of family income.
The study
concludes that parents are open to the idea of sending children
to other types of school, perhaps further from home, when cost is
not an issue.
Thousands
of bright pupils are being penalised for doing well in new-look
school league tables, academics revealed yesterday. Their
achievements are not recognised in official lists designed to show
which schools do most to raise standards for their pupils.
Durham
University researchers discovered that the Government's so-called
'value-added' league tables did not allow schools to record the
progress of the most able pupils. This could lead primary teachers
to neglect classroom high-fliers in favour of less bright pupils
who can help them climb the rankings.
Schools
are ranked according to the progress pupils have made between the
ages of seven and 11. The tables - published for the first time
last year - show how well pupils performed at age 11 compared with
expectations based on test results at age 7. But pupils who do not
shine at age 7 earn more points as they make progress than those
who are outstanding and simply maintaining their level.
"Michael
Howard's promise on June17, 2004, to provide a grammar school place
for every child qualified to have one deserves unqualified support,"
writes Simon Heffer.
"There is
no greater scandal in our country than the denial of the chance
of a proper education to many gifted children who are, instead,
forcibly dumbed-down in sink comprehensive schools."
Now
we know Independent schools send just as many poor pupils to University
as State schools - read the
full story.
More
exams, less education says Anthony Seldon, Headmaster of Brighton
College
Top
schools drop GCSE for O-level style exams
by
Laura Clark, Education Reporter - Daily Mail, September 4, 2004
Leading
public schools are switching from GCSE to an exam based on the old
O-level out of growing frustration with 'mind-numbing course work'.
The country's top school at GCSE will this month adopt the qualification
for its maths students as it involves sitting only final examinations,
it emerged yestereday.
The
North London Collegiate School may also change to the new International
GCSE in other subjects such as English and History. It is among
growing numbers of fee-paying schools opting for the IGCSE as it
involves only written papers with no compulsory course work. Oundle
School in Peterborough and Cheltenham College became the first schools
to enter pupuils for the IGSE this summer, putting nearly 200 candidates
in for maths.
Teachers
at Oundle have branded GCSE maths course work 'mind-numbing' because
it involves tedious data collection. Now North London Collegiate
is set to adopt the maths IGCSE for all 104 girls starting GCSE
courses this term.
The
move emerged as the £9,540-a-year girls' day school in Edgward
clinched first place in this year's Daily Mail league table of GCSE
results. Pupils passed 96.7% of exams at grades A* and A with no
candidate gaining below a B in any subject.
The
top ranked boys' school emerged as St Paul's in Barnes, West London,
where pupils passed 92.6% of exams at the top two grades. Last night
St Paul's high master, Dr Martin Stephen, joined the assault on
GCSE course work, called for it to be scrapped in all subjects.
He added that the web had made it too easy for pupils to cheat.
He said: "With the resources now available on the Internet,
plagiarism is virtually impossible to detect."
The
IGCSE is akin to the old O-level - scapped in 1987 - as pupils are
tested in a series of final exams at the end of a two-year course.
North London Collegiate's deputy head, Oliver Blond, said: "GCSE
maths course work is not always challenging but it is always time-consuming.
This has started with maths but I believe the heads of the English
and History departments will certainly have a look at what the difference
is between the GCSE and IGCSE."
The
Independent Schools Council yesterday revealed that pupils at fee-paying
schools passed 55.5% of exams at the top two grades compared with
17.4% nationally.
As
record numbers of sixth-formers achieve A at A-level, studies suggest
papers are now easier than the old O-levels. Read
this story here, then please cast your vote below.
Plesde
click one of the links above to cast your vote
|

The
Parent Truth Campaign has claimed that lifesized 'gay dolls' are
being used to teach children as young as three about same-sex relationships.
It is being claimed that their use will escalate if Section 28 is
repealed, especially since it has been reported that the Lesbian
Mothers Scotland group was given a £4,819 lottery grant to supply
the dolls to schools.

Medical schools win cash bonus
to take on C-grade students
by Sarah Harris, Edication Correspondent, Daily
Mail - August 5. 2004
Medical schools are being
encouraged to admit students with sub-standard A-levels in a
controversial New Labour scheme to widen access. Almost 600 students
with fewer than three A-levels at grade C have gained places despite
huge competition nationwide from more talented
pupils.
Universities receive extra
funds to support the low-performing students to help stop them
dropping out of the demanding course which normally needs at least
two A's and a B at A-level. Critics say the move raised serious
questions about patient safety if standards are
diluted.
Chris Gayling, the
Conservative spokesman on higher education, condemned the move as
social engineering which 'acts against the interests of the patients
and the Health Service. He said: "It is quite absurd that the
Government is paying universities to admit students without the
level of exam passes they would normally need to study medicine. We
should not be compromising our standards for medical students just
to help meet the government's political targets. This also means
that top-quality students with good exam results are being denied
the chance to study at leading medical schools simply because their
social background doesn't fit the Government's
plans."
Earlier this year, the Daily
Mail revealed how one talented pupil, Lucy Barnett, 18, was rejected
by Cambridge, Bristol, Newcastle and King's College London medical
schools. This was despite predictions that the student from
Charterhouse School, Surrey, would gain straight A's in her biology,
chemistry and Spanish A-levels.
Universities
which accept students with fewer than three grade Cs receive
additional money from a quango, the Higher Education Funding Council
for England (HEFCE).
Parliamentary written answers
obtained by the Tories show 480 full-time students earned university
medical schools extra funding of £126,092 in 2003-4 under its
improved retention scheme. Almost £22,000 has been earmarked for
medical schools by the HEFCE to support another 80 full-time medical
students who are not expected to make the grade in 2004-5. The 20
top university medical schools, including Oxford, Cambridge and
University College, London, will this year receive part of a
£159million funding pot to prevent students dropping
out.
A HEFCE spokesman said:"Many
Univesities with our support are committed to broadening the range
of medical students to reflect better the needs of the diverse
communities served by the NHS. Admission decisions are a matter for
the universities. They will make these decisions in the light of the
particular circumstances of individual
applicants."
The Council of Heads of
Medical Schools, a representative body, said: "Widening
participation indicatives seek to identicy those students with the
potential to become excellent doctors. They are students who have
not had the advantage of some of their peers but they are no less
able than others on the course."
Yesterday Cambridge and
University College, London, denied making offers to medical students
who achieved lower than three Cs at A-level. A spokesman for
Oxford University - which demands three As from medical students -
said lower grades would only be accepted in exceptional cases, such
as outstanding students who've suffered
illness."
Applications to read medicine
across the country have soared to 17,500 students a year. But places
exist for less than half that number amid shortages of academic
staff to teach them.
|
Do you
agree to reducing standards for medical students to meet political
targets, denying top-quality students with good exam results
the chance to study at leading medical schools because their
social background doesn't fit Government plans?
Agree
strongly
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
strongly
Don't
know
Don't
care
Please
click one of the links above to cast your vote
|
Current and prospective
Parliamentary candidates of all Parties running for election could
share a platform at public forums in every constituency. They would
be presented with the results of polls on this issue expressed
by the majority of voters in that constituency.
The candidates could
be asked if their own views and that of their Party manifesto corresponded
with the polls, and if not, how they intended to represent the will
of the majority of local voters. Local and National Press,
Radio and TV coverage would be arranged and the results published
on this web site.
Here
is another powerful strategy for using your vote effectively in
the forthcoming General Election. Send your sitting and prospective
MPs a letter defining your requirements if they want your vote.
This example deals with the proposed
EU Constitutional Treaty.
Your
letters would end: "If
you do not answer this letter, I shall take it that you intend to
follow the Government line. I shall act accordingly in the forthcoming
General Election. Here's on to force Tony Blair to resign:
|
Dear
Despite
his absolute and unequivocal assurances over the past year
of the serious risk to our security of Saddam Hussein's 'weapons
of mass destruction', Prime Minister Blair has admitted, that
the threat was non-existent. For that critical error of judgement
and for his gross incompetence in handling this very important
issue, I ask you to take immediate steps to ensure that Tony
Blair does the honourable thing and resign without delay..
I
would therefore be much obliged if you would propose and help
mobilise a Parliamentary vote of 'No Confidence' in Mr Blair
which, despite Labour's huge majority, would leave the PM
with no option but to resign.
If
I get no reply to this letter, I shall assume you will continue
to support Mr Blair as our Prime Minister. In such circumstances
I shall not vote for you in the forthcoming General Election.
Signed:
|
Or
why not create a questionnaire that you send to all the candidates
in your constituency, getting them to give yes/no answers to questions
of your choice, and ending it with the same paragraph(above).
Download
a printable example of the questionnaire.
It is high time for
the people of this United Kingdom to stop allowing themselves to
be manipulated by politicians. We need our representatives in Parliament
to genuinely reflect the view of the majority in their own constituency,
even if this means going against their personal and/or their party's
policy. While they may argue their case, hoping to change the minds
of the majority in their constituency, they should ultimately be
obliged to reflect the majority view of those who elect them.
It will be argued by politicians
of all parties that most voters don't have the knowledge necessary
to express an opinion on important subjects at issue, and that our
vote is a form of delegated democracy. We should argue that it is
their duty to ensure that we voters do have ready access to such
information as is necessary to form an intelligent opinion. That,
after all, is one main purpose of Opposition Parties in our Parliamentary
Democracy.
Most important of
all, such proceedings would rekindle in voters their latent interest
and obligation to cast their vote, knowing that the candidate of
their choice would be more likely to act in accordance with their
wishes. A much higher turnout in elections would be the result.
Contact your local
Party Chairman. Gain his support for setting up public forums in
your constituency on these, as well as any other relevant topics,
well before the next General Election expected in 2005. You should
then, depending on the integrity of the candidate of your choice,
feel fairly certain that your view on any subject being debated
in Parliament will more accurately be reflected by your representative
in that assembly.
If you have suggestions
for additional subjects, or material to include in the pages linked
to the subjects listed, please contact
the webmaster.
|