the people

Silent Majority Speaks

Rescuing Democracy in the United Kingdom from our current Elected Dictatorship

Spin, not face-to-face confrontations with the voters, is the Government's chosen method of communication. Ordinary people are dangerous. Ordinary people might ask a question which throws a politician 'off message'; the Cabinet member might reveal himself or herself to be a human being like us, and not a programmed android. Worse still, he or she might tell the truth.

Ann Leslie - Daily Mail, September 16, 2004

Blair wants to leave his mark on history - looks more like a stain to me.

Peter Thorndyke, Diss, Norfolk - Daily Mail, May 23, 2005

I know I'm me - why do I need an ID card?

"Sorry, officers, I don't have an ID card. I never applied for one. It seemed a bit steep at 300 quid. I do have my free passport, my driving licence and my London freedom travel pass, each with my photograph. I have my NHS medical card, with its lengthy number, given me at birth, my RAF service book with my Armed Forces number, and a chit authorising me to wear a few gongs -including a General Service Medal with Malaya bar, for fighting communist terrorists on behalf of my country, or so they told me.

"I've also got various credit cards and store cards, all with my signature on the back, generally good for buying the everyday requrements for life as well as the odd luxury. If you decide to arrest me, I suppose I'll have to be photographed and given another number, besides my PINs.

"I'm afraid I haven't got a pension book; it was taken away."

"By thieves, sir?"

"No ... well, not exactly. By the Government. By the way, may I see your warrant cards please, gentlemen?"

Oh dear, they've disappeared. E. Harry Gumer, Romford, ESSEX - Daily Mail, June 1, 2005

NO means NO

When does NO mean MAYBE? When it's not the answer the EU wants. With the courageous French NON resounding in their ears, shabby, undemocratic self-interested leaders of Europe propose ignoring the part of their precious constitution that requires ratification by all members and continuing without one of the biggest founder members to prevent derailing the gravy train.

As in Ireland, they refuse to accept any NO votes, ignoring the will of the people, and re-stage votes until they can engineer the 'correct' answer. Sadly, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw dances to their tune like a puppet on a string. With tactics such as these, how can anyone really believe the EU has our interests at heart. Letter from Steve Penny, Kingsnorth, Kent - Daily Mail, June1, 2005

Surely the French result makes the £1million the EU recently spent on a treaty signing ceremony seem a trifle premature and extravagant. Letter from Keith Wiseman, Bury, Lancs. - Daily Mail, June1, 2005

Google
WWW silentmajorityspeaks.com

Britain has traditionally been one of the biggest net contributors to the EU because we do not get as much money back from Brussels in farm and regional subsidies as our rivals.

According to Treasury figures, between 1995-2002, Britain's average contribution taking the rebate into account, was £2.6billion, or £43.55 per head of population.

The French - the biggest recipient of farm subsidies - contributed £1billion a year or £16.08 per head of their population.

Tony Blair should know that respect comes by example - from the top. If a country's leader has no respect for the rule of international law and no respect for the truth, how can he expect anyone to have respect. Letter from P.J.Atkinson, Ashford, Kent - Daily Mail, January 12, 2006

The Chancellor's single greatest act of vandalism in almost nine years in office has been his wanton destruction of Britain's private retirement industry. By slapping a massive tax on pension funds, now worth £7.3billion a year, he has helped to turn the best private retirement industry in Europe into a basket-case in perpetual crisis. Together with the adoption of European accounting rules - which make it much riskier to operate a company pension scheme - hundreds of firms have shut their final salary plans to new employees and slashed benefits to existing staff. From Allister Heath: "I've seen the future and its grey" in THE SPECTATOR - April 15, 2006

Nine years ago the British people were sold a fantasy of clean and competent government of principle and honesty. Its shiny wrappings stripped away, the product now reveals its true nature: Personal greed, arrogance, incompetence, shamelessness, rash warmongering and an inability to accept - as is clear to almost everyone else - that it is time to go. Editorial - The Mail on Sunday, May 28, 2006

December 26, 2006 (1308 days since war ended)

Death Toll: 2978 US - 126 UK - >650,000? civilians - 25 media

January 2, 2007 (1315 days since war ended)

Death Toll: 3003 US - 127 UK - >650,000? civilians - 25 media

This site has had  visitors

STOP PRESS

As Hazel Blears admits we're a nation of bingers

This seasonal slip has exposed the tragic dishonesty of Labour's drink laws

The Melanic Phillips Column - Daily Mail, January 1, 2007

Sore head? Well, this is after all the day when the nation customarily wakes up with a bit of a hangover. Seeing in the new year by carousing into the small hours is a seasonal ritual. Surely only a killjoy would object?

The problem is, though, that getting legless is not merely confined to the festive season and the singing of Auld Lang Syne. It is unfortunately an all-year-round British national pastime. This obvious but much-denied truth has now been blurted out by the Labour Party chairman Hazel Blears. In the course of an interview with a Sunday newspaper, she acknowledged that the British 'enjoyed getting drunk'.

The dream of turning Britain into continental-style 'cafe-society' - where people generally drink only as an accompaniment to meals - was therefore probably an illusion, she said, since the 'Anglo-Saxon mentality' meant people were unable to confine themselves to a glass of wine.

NOW she tells us! Ms Blears, let us not forget, was formerly a Home Office minister charged with stopping binge-drinking. But the policy she implemented was based on the very assumption which she has now confessed is a fantasy. That policy, in combination with unregulated commercial irresponsibility, has inflated the scourge of binge-drinking into a national epidemic, responsible for a vast swathe of personal and social destruction.

Destructive

Yet Ms Blears, one of the architects of this disaster, is still distinctly coy about the scale of what she and her fellow ministers have so cavalierly unleashed - defending the policy, expressing anxiety merely about people getting drink-related illnesses at earlier ages and recommending 'more education' as a solution.

This sounds horribly like the Government's policy on such social ills as drug abuse or teenage pregnancy: make drugs or underage sex more available or socially acceptable, and then set up an industry to 'educate' children about the consequences. Surely it's ministers who need to be educated about the destructive impact of their ignorant and irresponsible ideas?

As Ms Blears has now belatedly acknowledged, Britain has a long tradition of drunkenness, going back to the days when ancient Britons bedecked themselves in woad and knocked back the mead before going in for a spot of rape and pillage. In the licentious 18th century, the country descended into a Hogarthian, gin-soaked stupor before the Victorians, through the stern application of religion and more exhortation, sobered the country up.

Order was restored, along with self-restraint, and so things largely remained until the arrival of the values free-for-all of the past three decades or so. When the Blairites came to power, with their trademark tendency to meddle and muddle, they combined their instinct to address social ills such as alcohol abuse with their equally strong instinct to do precisely the wrong thing.

Characteristically refusing to face reality, they chose instead to look to Europe - that bolt-hole for lazy leftists who want to avoid facing up to hard decisions - and decided absurdly that European cafe society could be imported into Britain at the stroke of a legislator's pen.

Since pleasant and civilised European cafes stayed open until the small hours with no drunken customers staggering off into the night, they decided that if British pubs also stayed open until the small hours, the British would promptly stop drinking to excess.

In vain did this newspaper and many other critics, including judges, doctors and churchmen, point out that giving people more opportunity to drink would merely mean that more people would drink even more. This was always obvious given British drinking habits, and particularly the distressing fashion among the young for getting 'totally wasted' as a principal means of entertainment.

What was needed was not a relaxation of the drinking laws but a tightening, not least because of the hugely increased availability of alcohol - and a corresponding increase in social acceptability - through the cynical marketing of alcopops, which has made vodka and other spirits as accessible and attractive to the young as lemonade.

However, when there were no signs of rampaging mobs after the licensing laws were relaxed, ministers crowed about the 'success' of their policy and attacked the 'scaremongers' who had predicted serious consequences.

Those ministers were wrong. The consequences - as Ms Blears has now admitted - have been appalling. People like Arthur Claye know this from painful personal experience.

Desperate to warn the public of the dangers of young people drinking to excess, Mr Claye released harrowing pictures of his daughter, 26 year-old Elisabeth, lying comatose under an oxygen mask in Newcastle General Hospital where she was taken unconscious after a drunken night out.

Like many alcoholics, Ms Claye, who sometimes needs a slug of vodka as early as 9 am, promptly denied she had a problem - even though she was still drinking - and blamed her father for his 'betrayal'. "I'm a social drinker, like other normal people," she claimed.

But normal people are now drinking to excess as a matter of course. Certainly, as Ms Claye claimed about herself, an increasing number may be particularly vulnerable because of broken home lives. But the real driver of this problem is the hugely increased availability and social acceptability of alcohol. And the toll is simply appalling.

Since Labour came to power in 1997, the number of patients treated for alcohol-related conditions in Accident and Emergency wards has doubled, while the number of children and teenagers receiving treatment has increased by a third. Some under-18s have downed more than a bottle of vodka in a single drinking session.

On any weekend evening in Accident and Emergency units around the country, the bulk of casualties being treated are the result of drink related incidents. Official statistics have revealed that 148,477 such patients were treated in our hard-pressed A&E wards in the past year compared with 75,863 in 1997.

As doctors have said, such figures are merely the 'tip of the iceberg'', since they do not even include people treated for injuries sustained in incidents such as drunken fights or drink-driving. The problem of binge-drinking goes across class, age and gender. On university campuses, drinking staggering amounts of alcohol is not only acceptable but expected. Over the past decade, young women have doubled the amount they drink.

Casualties

The charity Alcohol concern has said the number of over-65's drinking to excess is soaring. Although the Government claimed that children buying alcohol would face on-the-spot fines, while the staff who served them would incur even tougher penalties, almost one in four bars or shops has been found to sell alcohol to underage people.

The British Association for Emergency Medicine has found an increase in alcohol-related injuries treated in hospital among all age groups since the change in the drinking laws.

Yet apart from yesterday's limited verbal foray by Ms Blears into the real world, the Government still seeks to deny that its policy has been an abject -and indeed, lethal - failure. Fatuously, the Health Department insists that the rise of few facilities such as walk-in centres could explain the grown in treatment for drink-related injuries.

So the problem is cause neither by alcohol nor by the policy which has promoted its intake, but instead by the clinics treating its effects! Just what have these Health Department officials been drinking?

Whether in dealing with illegal drugs, gambling, underage sex or alcohol, Labour policy has been to take the brakes off. The result is an epidemic of social mayhem. Rather more than occasion shafts of ministerial light will be needed if this onslaught of social damage and personal misery - the product of official cynicism and folly - is ever to be stemmed.

B A C K

READ  YOUR  LETTERS

If you have suggestions for additional subjects, or material to include in the pages linked to the subjects listed, please contact the webmaster.

 

 

 

 

Polling Booth
NHS Dentists
Al Queda/Iraq
Blair or Bliar?
Tax and Waste
Votes at 16
Prisoners' Votes
Green Field Sites
Power
Transport
EU Constitution
MMR Vaccine
N H S
Schools
Top-up Fees
Fisheries Policy
Pensions
Immigration
Asylum 
Scottish MPs
Rgnl Assembly 
Fox Hunting
G M Foods
H I V
Al Queda/Iraq
Blair or Bliar?
I D Cards
HOME
PLEASE  LEAVE  YOUR  MESSAGE  HERE
Polling Booth
NHS Dentists
Al Queda/Iraq
Blair or Bliar?
Tax and Waste
Votes at 16
Prisoners' Votes
Green Field Sites
Power
Transport
EU Constitution
MMR Vaccine
N H S
Schools
Top-up Fees
Fisheries Policy
Pensions
Immigration
Asylum 
Scottish MPs
Rgnl Assembly 
Fox Hunting
G M Foods
H I V
Al Queda/Iraq
Blair or Bliar?
I D Cards
HOME
PLEASE  LEAVE  YOUR  MESSAGE  HERE
Polling Booth
NHS Dentists
Al Queda/Iraq
Blair or Bliar?
Tax and Waste
Votes at 16
Prisoners' Votes
Green Field Sites
Power
Transport
EU Constitution
MMR Vaccine
N H S
Schools
Top-up Fees
Fisheries Policy
Pensions
Immigration
Asylum 
Scottish MPs
Rgnl Assembly 
Fox Hunting
G M Foods
H I V
Al Queda/Iraq
Blair or Bliar?
I D Cards
HOME
PLEASE  LEAVE  YOUR  MESSAGE  HERE