Rescuing
Democracy in the United Kingdom from our current Elected
Dictatorship
|
Come
back Gilligan, all is forgiven. Penny Young, Diss, Norfolk,
to The Guardian, February 24, 2005
Spin,
not face-to-face confrontations with the voters, is the
Government's chosen method of communication. Ordinary
people are dangerous. Ordinary people might ask a question
which throws a politician 'off message'; the Cabinet member
might reveal himself or herself to be a human being like
us, and not a programmed android. Worse still, he or she
might tell the truth. Ann Leslie
- Daily Mail, September 16, 2004
Power
cut, please
Labour's
pollsters have Tony Blair running scared, because they have
informed him that if turnout at the next election is below
50%, the result will be a hung parliament. This would be
good news for those of us who, viewing the damage inflicted
by recent governments, would like nothing better than a
Parliament powerless to do anything. Letter from Ron
Phillips, London W14 - Daily Mail 17/2/05
|
Tony
Blair's pledge cards made no mention of pensioners. Perhaps
they're the jokers.
Letter
to the Daily Mail from Brian Green, Daventry, Northants
- February 22, 2005
The
Guardian's Polly Toynbee says 'a profoundly nasty streak'
among voters worried about poverty, crime and immigration
might cause them to vote against the Government. Isn't
it time we replaced the present electorate with one more
to Polly's liking? Ephraim Hardcastle, Daily Mail,
February 24, 2005
|
Blair
repeats big lie 20 times
By
Graeme Wilson and David Hughes - Daily Mail, March 19, 2005
Tony
Blair repeated Labour's 'big lie' on Tory
spending no fewer than 20 times yesterday as he launched a desperate
bid to salvage his election strategy. The Prime Minister was forced
to rewrite a keynote speech as he battled to deflect the furore
over Labour claims that Michael Howard will slash pubic spending
by £35 billion.
Critics
have condemned the claim as nonsense. They stress the Tories are
simply pledging to increase spending at a slower rate than Labour
- not make cuts. But Tony Blair defiantly brushed aside such concerns
yesterday, referring to the £35 billion figure an astonishing
20 times in his speech to Labour's Welsh conference in Swansea.
As he did so, it emerged that Labour's election campaign is close
to paralysis because of the Prime Minister's failure to create
a high profile role for Gordon Brown.
Plans
to give the Chancellor - far and away Labour's most popular politician
- a prominent new role in the campaign team have stalled because
Mr Blair appears reluctant to demote campaign supremo Alan Milburn.
Fresh efforts are being made this weekend to resolve the stand-off
and give the lacklustre campaign greater focus.
Mr
Blair's Swansea speech was condemned by the Conservatives who
accused him of treating voters with contempt by continuing to
peddle his lies. And even some of the delegates in the hall appeared
confused as Mr Blair embarked on an increasingly tortuous defence
of his anti-Tory attack.
The
sense of disarray was underlined by Welsh Secretary Peter Hain,
who warned delegates that Labour 'could lose' the election if
its grassroots supporters stay at home on polling day. Mr Blair
was forced onto the back foot on Thursday when Labour's post-Budget
poster launch was engulfed in controversy over the £35 billion
cuts claim.
Yesterday
Mr Blair had to devote more than half his speech to the issue
- and his increasingly convoluted attempts to explain how the
Tory promises of more modest spending increases were really cuts.
The Prime Minister even resorted to quoting statements from Shadow
Chancellor Oliver Letwin in a bid to defend his claims. Yet all
the quotes made clear that the Tories were actually promising
smaller spending increases, so that by 2012 public spending would
be '£35 billion less' than Labour.
Despite
this, Mr Blair declared: "The Tory Shadow Chancellor is saying
that by the end of the parliament, if elected, Labour's programme
will be cut back by £35 billion. It's not a Labour smear,
it's a Tory promise. There is the even odder assertion that because
the £35 billion is a cut to our future programmes, it's
not really a cut at all. Surely that's what the election is about
- the future."
Mr
Blair also tried to play down his humiliating showdown with ITV's
political editor Nick Robinson, who caught him off guard at Thursday's
poster launch by accusing him of 'distorting' Tory policies. "If
the Tories have their way, this row over the £35 billion
will be sound and fury that signifies nothing. We challenge them.
They accuse us of lying. Punch and Judy. The public turn off.
The media move on," he said. "The £35 billion
is not a political spat. It's a prism through which two futures
can be seen."
But
the claims were slapped down by Tory Chairman, Liam Fox. "Yesterday
Tony Blair unveiled Labour's Big Lie. Even though he was rightly
condemned from all quarters, he obviously does not care,"
said Dr Fox. "He has thrown away the pretence of trying to
fight his election on anything positive. The man who gave us the
dodgy dossier is now giving us the Big Lie - the man is rattled."
|
Perhaps
Ann Widdecombe was right about Michael Howard, but it
should have been KNIGHT with a K, and he could have saved
us from the monsters Blair and Campbell - Letter to
the Dail Mayil from Les Fletcher, Rhos-on-Sea, Colwyn
Bay, Wales - February 18, 2005
After
a clear vote against them, we still got eight non-elected
Regional Assemblies. When we vote against the EU Constitution,
we'll get them anyway. Letter from P.Cove, Aylesbury,
BUCKS.- Daily Mail, January 31, 2005
THE
TIMES slavish support for the Government worries some
members of the paper's staff, not to mention any perspicacious
readers who are left. Political editor Philip Webster
was questioned about this when he addressed colleagues
as part of an in-house 'masterclass' exercise. Small wonder.
One of his Blair-worshipping subordinates wrote a news
story yesterday poo-pooing the row over Labours anti-semitic
poster mocking Michael Howard, saying it was merely £5million
worth of 'free publicity' for the party. Ephraim Hardcastle
- Daily Mail, Febrauary 2, 2005
Hold
the front page
Further
to BBC bias (Mail), very often on BBC Breakfast and Breakfast
With Frost, coverage of the morning papers is censored.
If the front page of the Daily Mail is critical of Tony
Blair and his Soviet-style Government, it is not shown,
although the front pages of all the other newspapers are
shown. A supposedly independent broadcasting body is acting
as censor for this Government - an absolute disgrace.
Letter from Peter Fish, Chippenham, Wilts. .- Daily Mail,
February 17, 2005
|
The
REAL NASTY PARTY- How
Labour is the true home of spite, bigotry and contempt for the
public
For
the health of our democracy, we, the people of the United Kingdom,
must find a way to force Mr Blair to resign
Such
defiance of the democratic process and the will of the majority
of we people of the UK, must be exposed by voters as a matter
or urgency, and not just in the two by-elections we have had this
July and the European elections in June 2004. But how can this
be done?
The
most effective way of getting our deceitful PM to resign would
be to mobilise the army of Labour MPs currently in the House of
Commons and get them to demand it, the loss of their seat to be
a penalty if they did not. All voters in Labour-held constituencies
need to write a letter along these lines to their local Labour
MPs:
|
Dear
Despite
his absolute and unequivocal assurances over the past year
of the serious risk to our security of Saddam Hussein's
'weapons of mass destruction', Prime Minister Blair
has admitted, that the threat was non-existent. For that
critical error of judgement and for his gross incompetence
in handling this very important issue, I ask you to take
immediate steps to ensure that Tony Blair does the honourable
thing and resign without delay..
I
would therefore be much obliged if you would propose and
help mobilise a Parliamentary vote of 'No Confidence' in
Mr Blair which, despite Labour's huge majority, would leave
the PM with no option but to resign.
If
I get no reply to this letter, I shall assume you will continue
to support Mr Blair as our Prime Minister. In such circumstances
I shall not vote for you in the forthcoming General Election.
Signed:
|
Simple,
non-violent, protest letters along these lines on a variety of
issues could be the basis for re-vitalising our democracy and
increasing voters' interest and participation in politics. Download
a printable copy of the above letter here.
There
is another way for the voice of the silent majority to be heard,
a voice that made sure broken promises would not only be revealed,
but punished in subsequent elections.
In
the year available before the General Election expected in 2005,
many topics are available as ammunition, each one asking questions.
A weapon for our purpose will be the results of Opinion Polls
in individual constituencies using ICM, NOP, Gallop, Mori
or YouGov.
Questions
suggested for this purpose are listed here.
CAST
YOUR VOTE ON A VARIETY OF OTHER IMPORTANT ISSUES HERE.
Current
and prospective Parliamentary candidates of all Parties running
for election could share a platform at public forums in every
constituency. They would be presented with the results of
polls on this issue expressed by the majority of voters in that
constituency.
The candidates could be asked if their own views and that of their
Party manifesto corresponded with the polls, and if not, how they
intended to represent the will of the majority of local voters.
Local and National Press, Radio and TV coverage would be arranged
and the results published on this web site.
Here
is another powerful strategy for using your vote effectively in
the forthcoming General Election. Send your sitting and prospective
MPs a letter defining your requirements if they want your vote.
This example deals with the proposed
EU Constitutional Treaty.
Your
letters would end: "If you do not answer this letter, I shall
take it that you intend to follow the Government line. I shall
act accordingly in the forthcoming General Election.
Or
why not create a questionnaire that you send to all the candidates
in your constituency, getting them to give yes/no answers to questions
of your choice, and ending it with the same paragraph(above).
Download
a printable example of the questionnaire.
It
is high time for the people of this United Kingdom to stop allowing
themselves to be manipulated by politicians. We need our representatives
in Parliament to genuinely reflect the view of the majority in
their own constituency, even if this means going against their
personal and/or their party's policy. While they may argue their
case, hoping to change the minds of the majority in their constituency,
they should ultimately be obliged to reflect the majority view
of those who elect them.
It
will be argued by politicians of all parties that most voters
don't have the knowledge necessary to express an opinion on important
subjects at issue, and that our vote is a form of delegated democracy.
We should argue that it is their duty to ensure that we voters
do have ready access to such information as is necessary to form
an intelligent opinion. That, after all, is one main purpose of
Opposition Parties in our Parliamentary Democracy.
Most
important of all, such proceedings would rekindle in voters their
latent interest and obligation to cast their vote, knowing that
the candidate of their choice would be more likely to act in accordance
with their wishes. A much higher turnout in elections would be
the result.
Contact
your local Party Chairman. Gain his support for setting up public
forums in your constituency on these, as well as any other relevant
topics, well before the next General Election expected in 2005.
You should then, depending on the integrity of the candidate of
your choice, feel fairly certain that your view on any subject
being debated in Parliament will more accurately be reflected
by your representative in that assembly.
