Silent Majority Speaks
Rescuing Democracy in the United Kingdom from our current Elected Dictatorship
|
Spin,
not face-to-face confrontations with the voters, is the Government's
chosen method of communication. Ordinary people are dangerous. Ordinary
people might ask a question which throws a politician 'off message';
the Cabinet member might reveal himself or herself to be a human being
like us, and not a programmed android. Worse still, he or she might
tell the truth.
Ann Leslie - Daily Mail, September 16, 2004
Blair wants to leave his
mark on history - looks more like a stain to me.
Peter Thorndyke, Diss,
Norfolk - Daily Mail, May 23, 2005
I know I'm me - why do I
need an ID card?
"Sorry, officers, I
don't have an ID card. I never applied for one. It seemed a bit steep
at 300 quid. I do have my free passport, my driving licence and my
London freedom travel pass, each with my photograph. I have my NHS
medical card, with its lengthy number, given me at birth, my RAF
service book with my Armed Forces number, and a chit authorising me to
wear a few gongs -including a General Service Medal with Malaya bar,
for fighting communist terrorists on behalf of my country, or so they
told me.
"I've also got various credit
cards and store cards, all with my signature on the back, generally
good for buying the everyday requrements for life as well as the odd
luxury. If you decide to arrest me, I suppose I'll have to be
photographed and given another number, besides my PINs.
"I'm afraid I haven't got a
pension book; it was taken away."
"By thieves, sir?"
"No ... well, not exactly. By the
Government. By the way, may I see your warrant cards please, gentlemen?"
Oh dear, they've disappeared. E.
Harry Gumer, Romford, ESSEX - Daily Mail, June 1, 2005
NO means NO
When does NO mean MAYBE?
When it's not the answer the EU wants.
With the
courageous French NON resounding in their ears, shabby, undemocratic
self-interested leaders of Europe propose ignoring the part of their
precious constitution that requires ratification by all members and
continuing without one of the biggest founder members to prevent
derailing the gravy train.
As in Ireland,
they refuse to accept any NO votes, ignoring the will of the people,
and re-stage votes until they can engineer the 'correct' answer. Sadly,
Foreign Secretary Jack Straw dances to their tune like a puppet on a
string. With tactics such as these, how can anyone really believe the
EU has our interests at heart. Letter from Steve Penny, Kingsnorth, Kent - Daily
Mail, June1, 2005
Surely
the French result makes the £1million the EU recently spent on a
treaty signing ceremony seem a trifle premature and extravagant. Letter from Keith Wiseman, Bury, Lancs. - Daily Mail,
June1, 2005
|
May 31, 2005 (761 days since war
ended)
Death Toll: 1,657 US - 89 UK - >6,164?
Iraqi - >17,300 civilians - 25 media
June 17, 2005 (779 days since war
ended)
Death Toll: 1,716 US - 89 UK -
>6,164? Iraqi - >17,300? civilians - 25 media
June 26, 2005 (788 days since war
ended)
Death Toll: 1,737 US - 89 UK -
>6,164? Iraqi - >17,300? civilians - 25 media
July 6, 2005 (798 days since war
ended)
Death Toll: 1,751 US - 90 UK -
>6,164? Iraqi - >17,300? civilians - 25 media
August 24, 2005 (847 days since
war ended)
Death Toll: 1,869 US - 93 UK - >>6,164?
Iraqi - >>17,300? civilians - 25 media
September
29, 2005 (883 days since war ended)
Death Toll: 1,928 US - 96 UK - >>6,164?
Iraqi - >>17,300? civilians - 25 media
October
11, 2005 (895 days since war ended)
Death Toll: 1,956 US - 96UK - >>6,164?
Iraqi - >>17,300? civilians - 25 media
October
20, 2005 (904 days since war ended)
Death Toll: 1,986 US - 97UK - >>6,164?
Iraqi - >>17,300? civilians - 25 media
October
25, 2005 (909 days since war ended)
Death Toll: 2,001 US - 97UK - >>6,164?
Iraqi - >>17,300? civilians - 25 media
Britain has
traditionally been one of the biggest net contributors to the EU
because we do not get as much money back from Brussels in farm and
regional subsidies as our rivals.
According to
Treasury figures, between 1995-2002, Britain's average contribution
taking the rebate into account, was £2.6billion, or £43.55
per head of population.
The French -
the biggest recipient of farm subsidies - contributed £1billion a
year or £16.08 per head of their population.
|
November
17, 2005 (932 days since Iraq war ended)
Death Toll: 2,080 US - 97UK - >>6,164?
Iraqi - >>17,300? civilians - 25 media
So
that's why they told
us there were just 95 Polish plumbers here!
Blair
and his 'government' is losing control and credibility
"We'll
miss our asylum targets" Labour
admits failure over expulsion policy it trumpeted
By
Stephen Doughty, Social Affairs Correspondent - Daily Mail, November
23, 2005
"By
the end of next year we want the monthly removal rate to exceed
the unfounded applications" Tony Blair,
September 2004
"It's
unfortunate that we did not meet the target as per the original
deadline" ... PM's spokesman yesterday
Labour
admitted yesterday that it failed to meet its target for deporting
failed asylum seekers. Tony Blair promised to reduce the backlog
by the end of this year. But last night, Immigration Minister
Tony McNulty said this would not be achieved until at least February
(2006). Figures which would demonstrate that the target has been
met will not be available until May (2006?)
The
setback means that the 295,000 backlog of failed asylum seekers
waiting to be sent home is continuing to grow. At the present
rate, it would take 20 years to deport them all, even if no more
arrived. The Prime Minister set the target in September last year
(2004).
His
promise was used during the (2005) General Election campaign to
defend Labour against accusations by the Tories that immigration
was out of control. Mr Blair promised that by the end of this
year, the number of failed asylum seekers removed each month would
be higher than the number of unsuccessful applications made.
Home
Office made no figures available yesterday to show how far from
target the Government really is. But figures for July, August,
September show the number of applications refused on appeal during
the quarter was 6,685, nearly double the number of failed asylum
seekers that were removed. Over the same period, there were 6,315
new asylum applications.
Including
all children and dependants, the number of asylum seekers who
arrived over the three months was 7,705, around 7% up on the quarter
before. It was the first rise in claims since Mr Blair's drive
to cut the number of asylum seekers began to take effect nearly
three years ago.
"We
continue to work towards our target of removing more failed asylum
seekers on a monthly basis that there are unfounded claims,"
said Mr, McNulty. "We recognise it's a tough target and more
needs to be done, but we'll continue to work towards this goal
and expect to meet it in February 2006."
He
promised to speed up removals by processing claims faster and
striking deals with foreign governments to return failed asylum
seekers. The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: "We
believe we will meet the target in the coming months. What this
has underlined is the difficulty of what it is we are trying to
do. But we believe we will meet it. It is unfortunate we didn't
meet it as per the original deadline, but given how far back we
started, it shows a considerable degree of progress."
The
Tory accused Mr Blair of breaking his electoral promises. Shadow
Home Secretary David Davis said: "Despite the Government's
repeated promises that they would sort out the asylum shambles,
they are not delivering. It is clear they are set to miss their
central asylum target. As a result, after eight years in office,
the number of people living here illegally is still growing. This
is not the 'firm and fair control over immigration' that Mr Blair
promised back in 1997. "
Sir
Andrew Green, from the Migrationwatch think-tank, said: "It
speaks volumes that they have admitted failing to reach their
target. But even achieving the target would make no impression
on the huge backlog."
So
that's why
they told us there were just 95 Polish plumbers here!
Daily Mail Reporter - November 23, 2005
Ministers
have no idea how many Eastern Europeans are working in
Britain, it emerged yesterday. The Home Office released
figures showing there are nearly 300,000 workers from
new EU states here - nearly 20 times the number it estimated
would come when they joined last year.
It
admitted this figure does not include the self-employed
- meaning there may be hundreds of thousands more Eastern
Europeans here. The loophole finally solves the so-called
'Polish plumber' mystery. Last month, Immigration Minister
Tony McNulty was met with incredulity when he said that
statistics showing there were just 95 plumbers from Poland
working in Britain were accurate. Soon after, the Daily
Mail managed to find that number of Polish plumbers within
24 hours in London alone.
And
yesterday's figures confirm that while there are only
110 Eastern European plumbers signed up on the Worker
Registration Scheme,m there are likely to to be thousands
more self-employed. A Home Office spokesman said: "The
Worker Registration Scheme is for employees. It does not
cover self-employed people who work in the UK because
they do not need to register."
The
loophole undermines the credibility of the scheme, which
was designed to keep track of Eastern European workers
and allow ministers to control numbers if necessary. In
2004, the then Home Secretary David Blunkett said the
scheme placed an obligation on workers to register. He
also said that it would mean they would work legally and
not 'fuel the sub-economy'.
In
fact, many Eastern European building workers are thought
to be part of the black economy, avoiding tax and insurance
payments. Last night, Mr McNulty admitted that the scheme
could be wound up early. "We're now in the throes
of assessing whether we need the Worker Registration Scheme
through to 2009 or whether we should keep it under review
on an annual basis," he told Channel 4 news.
Tory
Immigration spokesman Humfrey Malin said last night; "The
immigration system under Labour is a shambles. It is quite
clear that there are many people coming into the country
who are not on the official figures."
|
Losing
control and credibility
Comment
- Daily Mail, November 24, 2005
Careless
with truth, habitually incompetent, a breaker of promises
- why should New Labour be believed on a word it utters
over immigration and asylum? Time and again, we were assured
that only a relative handful of migrants would arrive
when Britain - virtually alone in the EU - threw open
its doors to workers from Easter Europe last year. Other
governments imposed restrictions when the 10 new accession
states joined. Not New Labour, which insisted there would
be no problems.
Only
weeks ago, Immigration Minister Tony McNulty paraded statistics
to show just 95 Polish plumbers are working in Britain,
seemingly vindicating predictions of only a modest inflow.
And then, of course, we had Tony Blair's repeated pledges
to deport failed asylum seekers and reduce the 285,000
backlog by the end of the year. So
much for rhetoric. Now the facts.
A
handful from Eastern Europe? Between July and September
there were a record 60,000 applicants for work permits.
That brings the total since last year to nearly 300,000
- 20 times higher than Government estimates. Yes, 20.
Even that does not tell the full story.
Home
Office statistics don't include the self-employed. Tens
or even hundreds of thousands more Eastern Europeans are
living here (and probably working in the black economy)
than are officially registered. Ministers haven't a clue.
That
doesn't stop them peddling absurd claims about Polish
plumbers. (Incidentally, the Mail had no trouble finding
95 within a day, in London alone).
Oh,
and as if all that weren't bad enough, we learned this
week that Mr Blair's promise to remove failed asylum seekers
can't be taken seriously either. He admits he isn't going
to meet his targets - though even if her did, it would
take 20 years to clear the existing backlog. Sadly, we
have grown all to accustomed to this Government's failures,
cover-ups and deceits over immigration.
Remember
how Beverley Hughes had to resign as Immigration Minister
over the racket i nvisas for Bulgarians and Romanians?
And how the civil servant who exposed the scandal was
fired? The truth is that for years, Ministers have actively
encouraged immigration without any proper consultation.
As this paper has long argued, there is a case for effectively
managed economic migration. But if the policy is to work
and social harmony is to be preserved, there has to be
honest, open, informed debate.
Sadly
this Government makes such a thing impossible.
|
If you have
suggestions for additional subjects, or material to include in the
pages linked to the subjects listed, please contact the webmaster.
|