the people

Silent Majority Speaks

Rescuing Democracy in the United Kingdom from our current Elected Dictatorship

Spin, not face-to-face confrontations with the voters, is the Government's chosen method of communication. Ordinary people are dangerous. Ordinary people might ask a question which throws a politician 'off message'; the Cabinet member might reveal himself or herself to be a human being like us, and not a programmed android. Worse still, he or she might tell the truth.

Ann Leslie - Daily Mail, September 16, 2004

Blair wants to leave his mark on history - looks more like a stain to me.

Peter Thorndyke, Diss, Norfolk - Daily Mail, May 23, 2005

I know I'm me - why do I need an ID card?

"Sorry, officers, I don't have an ID card. I never applied for one. It seemed a bit steep at 300 quid. I do have my free passport, my driving licence and my London freedom travel pass, each with my photograph. I have my NHS medical card, with its lengthy number, given me at birth, my RAF service book with my Armed Forces number, and a chit authorising me to wear a few gongs -including a General Service Medal with Malaya bar, for fighting communist terrorists on behalf of my country, or so they told me.

"I've also got various credit cards and store cards, all with my signature on the back, generally good for buying the everyday requrements for life as well as the odd luxury. If you decide to arrest me, I suppose I'll have to be photographed and given another number, besides my PINs.

"I'm afraid I haven't got a pension book; it was taken away."

"By thieves, sir?"

"No ... well, not exactly. By the Government. By the way, may I see your warrant cards please, gentlemen?"

Oh dear, they've disappeared. E. Harry Gumer, Romford, ESSEX - Daily Mail, June 1, 2005

NO means NO

When does NO mean MAYBE? When it's not the answer the EU wants.

With the courageous French NON resounding in their ears, shabby, undemocratic self-interested leaders of Europe propose ignoring the part of their precious constitution that requires ratification by all members and continuing without one of the biggest founder members to prevent derailing the gravy train.

As in Ireland, they refuse to accept any NO votes, ignoring the will of the people, and re-stage votes until they can engineer the 'correct' answer. Sadly, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw dances to their tune like a puppet on a string. With tactics such as these, how can anyone really believe the EU has our interests at heart. Letter from Steve Penny, Kingsnorth, Kent - Daily Mail, June1, 2005

Surely the French result makes the £1million the EU recently spent on a treaty signing ceremony seem a trifle premature and extravagant. Letter from Keith Wiseman, Bury, Lancs. - Daily Mail, June1, 2005

May 31, 2005 (761 days since war ended)

Death Toll: 1,657 US - 89 UK - >6,164? Iraqi - >17,300 civilians - 25 media

June 17, 2005 (779 days since war ended)

Death Toll: 1,716 US - 89 UK - >6,164? Iraqi - >17,300? civilians - 25 media

June 26, 2005 (788 days since war ended)

Death Toll: 1,737 US - 89 UK - >6,164? Iraqi - >17,300? civilians - 25 media

July 6, 2005 (798 days since war ended)

Death Toll: 1,751 US - 90 UK - >6,164? Iraqi - >17,300? civilians - 25 media

August 24, 2005 (847 days since war ended)

Death Toll: 1,869 US - 93 UK - >>6,164? Iraqi - >>17,300? civilians - 25 media

September 29, 2005 (883 days since war ended)

Death Toll: 1,928 US - 96 UK - >>6,164? Iraqi - >>17,300? civilians - 25 media

October 11, 2005 (895 days since war ended)

Death Toll: 1,956 US - 96UK - >>6,164? Iraqi - >>17,300? civilians - 25 media

October 20, 2005 (904 days since war ended)

Death Toll: 1,986 US - 97UK - >>6,164? Iraqi - >>17,300? civilians - 25 media

October 25, 2005 (909 days since war ended)

Death Toll: 2,001 US - 97UK - >>6,164? Iraqi - >>17,300? civilians - 25 media

Google
WWW silentmajorityspeaks.com

Britain has traditionally been one of the biggest net contributors to the EU because we do not get as much money back from Brussels in farm and regional subsidies as our rivals.

According to Treasury figures, between 1995-2002, Britain's average contribution taking the rebate into account, was £2.6billion, or £43.55 per head of population.

The French - the biggest recipient of farm subsidies - contributed £1billion a year or £16.08 per head of their population.

November 17, 2005 (932 days since Iraq war ended)

Death Toll: 2,080 US - 97UK - >>6,164? Iraqi - >>17,300? civilians - 25 media

STOP PRESS

So that's why they told us there were just 95 Polish plumbers here!

Blair and his 'government' is losing control and credibility

"We'll miss our asylum targets" Labour admits failure over expulsion policy it trumpeted

By Stephen Doughty, Social Affairs Correspondent - Daily Mail, November 23, 2005

"By the end of next year we want the monthly removal rate to exceed the unfounded applications" Tony Blair, September 2004

"It's unfortunate that we did not meet the target as per the original deadline" ... PM's spokesman yesterday

Labour admitted yesterday that it failed to meet its target for deporting failed asylum seekers. Tony Blair promised to reduce the backlog by the end of this year. But last night, Immigration Minister Tony McNulty said this would not be achieved until at least February (2006). Figures which would demonstrate that the target has been met will not be available until May (2006?)

The setback means that the 295,000 backlog of failed asylum seekers waiting to be sent home is continuing to grow. At the present rate, it would take 20 years to deport them all, even if no more arrived. The Prime Minister set the target in September last year (2004).

His promise was used during the (2005) General Election campaign to defend Labour against accusations by the Tories that immigration was out of control. Mr Blair promised that by the end of this year, the number of failed asylum seekers removed each month would be higher than the number of unsuccessful applications made.

Home Office made no figures available yesterday to show how far from target the Government really is. But figures for July, August, September show the number of applications refused on appeal during the quarter was 6,685, nearly double the number of failed asylum seekers that were removed. Over the same period, there were 6,315 new asylum applications.

Including all children and dependants, the number of asylum seekers who arrived over the three months was 7,705, around 7% up on the quarter before. It was the first rise in claims since Mr Blair's drive to cut the number of asylum seekers began to take effect nearly three years ago.

"We continue to work towards our target of removing more failed asylum seekers on a monthly basis that there are unfounded claims," said Mr, McNulty. "We recognise it's a tough target and more needs to be done, but we'll continue to work towards this goal and expect to meet it in February 2006."

He promised to speed up removals by processing claims faster and striking deals with foreign governments to return failed asylum seekers. The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: "We believe we will meet the target in the coming months. What this has underlined is the difficulty of what it is we are trying to do. But we believe we will meet it. It is unfortunate we didn't meet it as per the original deadline, but given how far back we started, it shows a considerable degree of progress."

The Tory accused Mr Blair of breaking his electoral promises. Shadow Home Secretary David Davis said: "Despite the Government's repeated promises that they would sort out the asylum shambles, they are not delivering. It is clear they are set to miss their central asylum target. As a result, after eight years in office, the number of people living here illegally is still growing. This is not the 'firm and fair control over immigration' that Mr Blair promised back in 1997. "

Sir Andrew Green, from the Migrationwatch think-tank, said: "It speaks volumes that they have admitted failing to reach their target. But even achieving the target would make no impression on the huge backlog."

So that's why they told us there were just 95 Polish plumbers here! Daily Mail Reporter - November 23, 2005

Ministers have no idea how many Eastern Europeans are working in Britain, it emerged yesterday. The Home Office released figures showing there are nearly 300,000 workers from new EU states here - nearly 20 times the number it estimated would come when they joined last year.

It admitted this figure does not include the self-employed - meaning there may be hundreds of thousands more Eastern Europeans here. The loophole finally solves the so-called 'Polish plumber' mystery. Last month, Immigration Minister Tony McNulty was met with incredulity when he said that statistics showing there were just 95 plumbers from Poland working in Britain were accurate. Soon after, the Daily Mail managed to find that number of Polish plumbers within 24 hours in London alone.

And yesterday's figures confirm that while there are only 110 Eastern European plumbers signed up on the Worker Registration Scheme,m there are likely to to be thousands more self-employed. A Home Office spokesman said: "The Worker Registration Scheme is for employees. It does not cover self-employed people who work in the UK because they do not need to register."

The loophole undermines the credibility of the scheme, which was designed to keep track of Eastern European workers and allow ministers to control numbers if necessary. In 2004, the then Home Secretary David Blunkett said the scheme placed an obligation on workers to register. He also said that it would mean they would work legally and not 'fuel the sub-economy'.

In fact, many Eastern European building workers are thought to be part of the black economy, avoiding tax and insurance payments. Last night, Mr McNulty admitted that the scheme could be wound up early. "We're now in the throes of assessing whether we need the Worker Registration Scheme through to 2009 or whether we should keep it under review on an annual basis," he told Channel 4 news.

Tory Immigration spokesman Humfrey Malin said last night; "The immigration system under Labour is a shambles. It is quite clear that there are many people coming into the country who are not on the official figures."

B A C K

Losing control and credibility

Comment - Daily Mail, November 24, 2005

Careless with truth, habitually incompetent, a breaker of promises - why should New Labour be believed on a word it utters over immigration and asylum? Time and again, we were assured that only a relative handful of migrants would arrive when Britain - virtually alone in the EU - threw open its doors to workers from Easter Europe last year. Other governments imposed restrictions when the 10 new accession states joined. Not New Labour, which insisted there would be no problems.

Only weeks ago, Immigration Minister Tony McNulty paraded statistics to show just 95 Polish plumbers are working in Britain, seemingly vindicating predictions of only a modest inflow. And then, of course, we had Tony Blair's repeated pledges to deport failed asylum seekers and reduce the 285,000 backlog by the end of the year. So much for rhetoric. Now the facts.

A handful from Eastern Europe? Between July and September there were a record 60,000 applicants for work permits. That brings the total since last year to nearly 300,000 - 20 times higher than Government estimates. Yes, 20. Even that does not tell the full story.

Home Office statistics don't include the self-employed. Tens or even hundreds of thousands more Eastern Europeans are living here (and probably working in the black economy) than are officially registered. Ministers haven't a clue.

That doesn't stop them peddling absurd claims about Polish plumbers. (Incidentally, the Mail had no trouble finding 95 within a day, in London alone).

Oh, and as if all that weren't bad enough, we learned this week that Mr Blair's promise to remove failed asylum seekers can't be taken seriously either. He admits he isn't going to meet his targets - though even if her did, it would take 20 years to clear the existing backlog. Sadly, we have grown all to accustomed to this Government's failures, cover-ups and deceits over immigration.

Remember how Beverley Hughes had to resign as Immigration Minister over the racket i nvisas for Bulgarians and Romanians? And how the civil servant who exposed the scandal was fired? The truth is that for years, Ministers have actively encouraged immigration without any proper consultation. As this paper has long argued, there is a case for effectively managed economic migration. But if the policy is to work and social harmony is to be preserved, there has to be honest, open, informed debate.

Sadly this Government makes such a thing impossible.

B A C K

PLEASE  LEAVE  YOUR  MESSAGE  HERE

READ  YOUR  LETTERS

If you have suggestions for additional subjects, or material to include in the pages linked to the subjects listed, please contact the webmaster.

 

 

 

 

Polling Booth
NHS Dentists
Al Queda/Iraq
Blair or Bliar?
Tax and Waste
Votes at 16
Prisoners' Votes
Green Field Sites
Power
Transport
EU Constitution
MMR Vaccine
N H S
Schools
Top-up Fees
Fisheries Policy
Pensions
Immigration
Asylum 
Scottish MPs
Rgnl Assembly 
Fox Hunting
G M Foods
H I V
Al Queda/Iraq
Blair or Bliar?
I D Cards
HOME
PLEASE  LEAVE  YOUR  MESSAGE  HERE
Polling Booth
NHS Dentists
Al Queda/Iraq
Blair or Bliar?
Tax and Waste
Votes at 16
Prisoners' Votes
Green Field Sites
Power
Transport
EU Constitution
MMR Vaccine
N H S
Schools
Top-up Fees
Fisheries Policy
Pensions
Immigration
Asylum 
Scottish MPs
Rgnl Assembly 
Fox Hunting
G M Foods
H I V
Al Queda/Iraq
Blair or Bliar?
I D Cards
HOME
PLEASE  LEAVE  YOUR  MESSAGE  HERE
Polling Booth
NHS Dentists
Al Queda/Iraq
Blair or Bliar?
Tax and Waste
Votes at 16
Prisoners' Votes
Green Field Sites
Power
Transport
EU Constitution
MMR Vaccine
N H S
Schools
Top-up Fees
Fisheries Policy
Pensions
Immigration
Asylum 
Scottish MPs
Rgnl Assembly 
Fox Hunting
G M Foods
H I V
Al Queda/Iraq
Blair or Bliar?
I D Cards
HOME
PLEASE  LEAVE  YOUR  MESSAGE  HERE