Rescuing
Democracy in the United Kingdom from our current Elected
Dictatorship
|
Spin, not
face-to-face confrontations with the voters, is the Government's
chosen method of communication. Ordinary
people are dangerous. Ordinary people might ask a question
which throws a politician 'off message'; the Cabinet member
might reveal himself or herself to be a human being like
us, and not a programmed android. Worse still, he or she
might tell the truth.
Ann Leslie - Daily Mail, September
16, 2004
|
There are lies,
damn lies and EU statistics
by
Andrew Alexander, Daily Mail June 25, 2004
HOORAY!
The Prime Minister has called for a 'separation of myth from reality'
about our EU member-ship. Nothing could be better - unprecedented
as it would be for him, the great myth-monger, and for Euro-enthusiasts
in general. No issue in British politics has involved more wilful
and wicked untruths. You may suggest Iraq, but you would be wrong.
That involved only one whopping untruth - about weapons of mass
destruction- and it lasted only months.
With
the EU, the lies stretch back over 30 years. I confess to finding,
as yet, no explanation for the sheer mendacity which the EU project
inspires to its enthusiasts.There is nothing dishonourable in
wanting a federal Europe. so why do they keep lying abut it, now
as in the past? The lies, Blair might consider, are one reason
why everything to do with the EU arouses such public suspicion.
We
face a new round of lying in the selling of the EU Constitution.
Mr Valiant For Truth got his team off to a flying start with his
claim on TV that 'we have won every single thing we wanted to
secure'. The most enthusiastic deceiver would be hard put to beat
this, since only 27 of the 275 proposed British amendments to
the constitution were accepted.
There
is a way in which even the humblest citizen can help the cause
of accuracy. As I reported last week, the BBC has circulated a
memo saying that claims of more than three million jobs being
at risk if we leave the EU should no longer be treated as 'uncontentious''.
This was immediately ignored in an interview with Blair, and since
then we have had Chancellor Gordon Brown making the same claim
on Radio 4's The World At One without challenge.
Ordinary
listeners may care to note any further instances of this claim
being treated as uncontentious and write to Mark Thompson, the
new BBC director general. They might also copy their letters to
Lord Ryder, chairman of the governors. This modest display of
civic duty would be a great service in separating at least one
myth from reality.
Blair
repeated the jobs claim, adorned with other misleading figures,
in the Commons this week. You might have thought, or hoped, that
Michael Howard would deal firmly with this. But the poor chap
has a difficulty. If he insists that these jobs do not
depend on EU membership, the public will ask why he wants to stay.
This is the big question he would prefer to avoid. A recent poll
showed that 37% wanted to leave the EU regardless, while 52% favoured
departure if trade and jobs were safeguarded.
The
Tory Party may be in an assertive mood since he became leader,
but that is not the same as a bold mood. However, he is likely
to find the issue of membership harder to dodge as the debate
on Europe warms up. If you can't get a straight
answer from the Tories abut jobs and costs, there is always the
think-tank CIVITAS,
which has done the sums and concluded
that it would pay to leave. Actually, if any-thing,the case is
understated, since British business would boom without the burden
of Bruissels.
We
are being carefully prepared for an election next spring, despite
the government majority remaining huge. Naturally, any Prime Minister
wants to strike before the Oppostion gathers too much strength.
And he certainly wants to avoid the humiliation of a defeat in
the referendum on the EU Constitution before an elction.
But
also nagging at the Government is the fear that the housing market
could deliver a fatal bnlow to the Chancellor's delicately - one
might say precariously - balanced calculations. By all reports,
he had to be scraped off the Treasury roof following the warning
about house prices uttered by Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank
of England. It is just the sort of thing to alarm an already fragile
market. A slump there could undermine consumer spending, on which
the Chancellor relies for his tax-and-spending programme.
One
school of thought argues that if the housing market is now on
the turn, or near it, prices will simply level out or fall insignificantly.
But booms almost invariably end in busts, and housing is no exception.
Busts
in the past have often been masked by inflation. For example,
if your house's value remained apparently unchanged in 1975. you
would actually have lost 25% in real purchasing power - inflation
then being at that level. This time inflation could not disguise
reality.
