Rescuing
Democracy in the United Kingdom from our current Elected
Dictatorship
|
Spin, not
face-to-face confrontations with the voters, is the Government's
chosen method of communication. Ordinary
people are dangerous. Ordinary people might ask a question
which throws a politician 'off message'; the Cabinet member
might reveal himself or herself to be a human being like
us, and not a programmed android. Worse still, he or she
might tell the truth.
Ann Leslie - Daily Mail, September
16, 2004
|
|
Letter from P.Cove, Aylesbury, BUCKS.-
Daily Mail, January 31, 2005
After a
clear vote against them, we still got eight non-elected
Regional Assemblies. When we vote against the EU Constitution,
we'll get them anyway.
|
The
great 0870 scam - the 158th stealth tax imposed on us by Blair
Even
our GPs dial in to the great 0870 dialling scam
By
Sean Poulter, Consumer Affairs Correspondent - Daily Mail, February
1, 2005
The
Health Service has been accused of trying to cash in on the
sick by introducing rip-off 0870 numbers for local doctors'
surgeries. Calls to the numbers are charged at just under 8p
a minute, more than double the amount most people pay for phone
calls.
Banks,
utility companies and government departments are generating
massive windfalls from what are effetively premium-rate lines
because most large organisations which use 0870 numbers take
a slice of the call cost.
Daily
Mail readers rected with fury yesterday to revelations about
the 0870 scam. It now appears the NHS has jumped on the gravy
train at the expense of patients trying to contact their GP.
An estimated 300 doctors' surgeries across the country have
introduced 0870 numbers in recent months in partnership with
a company called Network Europe Group. NEG supplies telephone
systems to aurgeries in return for a slice of the call charge
ikposed on patients.
The
net effect is that doctors and the NHS get a 'free' or cheap
phone system while NEG makes money from call charges. However,
all of this is effectively paid for by patients. Labour MP Dr
Howard Stoate, the only practising GP in the Commons, said:
"This is a very worrying trend. We are effectively looking
at charging for the NHS by the back door. Patients who need
an appointment or advice don't have any alternative but to pay
this charge. Doctors will say this is a good way of them improving
their phone systems, but I don't beleive this should be subsidised
by patient call charges."
Most
Britons currently pay a maximum of 3p a minute for national
or local calls under disscount packages. However, calls to 0870,
and 0845 numbers are excluded from these packages.
The
Lib Dem MP for Cornwall North, Paul Tyler, said government departments
and agencies were generating huge amounts by using 0870 numbers.
It appears the Home Office has 19 such lines while the DVLA
makes £1.1 million a year from its 0870 prefixes.
Mr
Tyler said: "It is a rip-off. Those who ask for information
they are entitled to as citizens are facing very high charges.
These are effectively premium rate phone lines."
Mail
readers from across the country yesterday complained about the
0870 rip-off. One said: "It is disgraceful that I should
have to pay 8p a minute for a questioning session from the NHS
if I get ill."
A
second said: "At least with a commercial firm you can choose
to deal with them or not. This is not possible for doctors'
surgeries." Another said: "Let's get this disgusting
rip-off halted."
NEG
said those dialling the system it uses in surgeries are generally
on the line for less time than in the past. So while the call
charge per minute was higher, they did not pay much more."
A
campaign has begun among consumers to bypass 0870 & 0845
numbers. A website saynoto0870.com
offers alternative, cheaper, numbers for major organisations.
For
the health of our democracy, we, the people of the United Kingdom,
must find a way to force Mr Blair to resign
Such
defiance of the democratic process and the will of the majority
of we people of the UK, must be exposed by voters as a matter
or urgency, and not just in the two by-elections we have had this
July and the European elections in June 2004. But how can this
be done?
The
most effective way of getting our deceitful PM to resign would
be to mobilise the army of Labour MPs currently in the House of
Commons and get them to demand it, the loss of their seat to be
a penalty if they did not. All voters in Labour-held constituencies
need to write a letter along these lines to their local Labour
MPs:
|
Dear
Despite
his absolute and unequivocal assurances over the past year
of the serious risk to our security of Saddam Hussein's
'weapons of mass destruction', Prime Minister Blair
has admitted, that the threat was non-existent. For that
critical error of judgement and for his gross incompetence
in handling this very important issue, I ask you to take
immediate steps to ensure that Tony Blair does the honourable
thing and resign without delay..
I
would therefore be much obliged if you would propose and
help mobilise a Parliamentary vote of 'No Confidence' in
Mr Blair which, despite Labour's huge majority, would leave
the PM with no option but to resign.
If
I get no reply to this letter, I shall assume you will continue
to support Mr Blair as our Prime Minister. In such circumstances
I shall not vote for you in the forthcoming General Election.
Signed:
|
Simple,
non-violent, protest letters along these lines on a variety of
issues could be the basis for re-vitalising our democracy and
increasing voters' interest and participation in politics. Download
a printable copy of the above letter here.
There
is another way for the voice of the silent majority to be heard,
a voice that made sure broken promises would not only be revealed,
but punished in subsequent elections.
In
the year available before the General Election expected in 2005,
many topics are available as ammunition, each one asking questions.
A weapon for our purpose will be the results of Opinion Polls
in individual constituencies using ICM, NOP, Gallop, Mori
or YouGov.
Questions
suggested for this purpose are listed here.
CAST
YOUR VOTE ON A VARIETY OF OTHER IMPORTANT ISSUES HERE.
Current
and prospective Parliamentary candidates of all Parties running
for election could share a platform at public forums in every
constituency. They would be presented with the results of
polls on this issue expressed by the majority of voters in that
constituency.
The candidates could be asked if their own views and that of their
Party manifesto corresponded with the polls, and if not, how they
intended to represent the will of the majority of local voters.
Local and National Press, Radio and TV coverage would be arranged
and the results published on this web site.
Here
is another powerful strategy for using your vote effectively in
the forthcoming General Election. Send your sitting and prospective
MPs a letter defining your requirements if they want your vote.
This example deals with the proposed
EU Constitutional Treaty.
Your
letters would end: "If you do not answer
this letter, I shall take it that you intend to follow the Government
line. I shall act accordingly in the forthcoming General Election.
Or
why not create a questionnaire that you send to all the candidates
in your constituency, getting them to give yes/no answers to questions
of your choice, and ending it with the same paragraph(above).
Download
a printable example of the questionnaire.
It
is high time for the people of this United Kingdom to stop allowing
themselves to be manipulated by politicians. We need our representatives
in Parliament to genuinely reflect the view of the majority in
their own constituency, even if this means going against their
personal and/or their party's policy. While they may argue their
case, hoping to change the minds of the majority in their constituency,
they should ultimately be obliged to reflect the majority view
of those who elect them.
It
will be argued by politicians of all parties that most voters
don't have the knowledge necessary to express an opinion on important
subjects at issue, and that our vote is a form of delegated democracy.
We should argue that it is their duty to ensure that we voters
do have ready access to such information as is necessary to form
an intelligent opinion. That, after all, is one main purpose of
Opposition Parties in our Parliamentary Democracy.
Most
important of all, such proceedings would rekindle in voters their
latent interest and obligation to cast their vote, knowing that
the candidate of their choice would be more likely to act in accordance
with their wishes. A much higher turnout in elections would be
the result.
Contact
your local Party Chairman. Gain his support for setting up public
forums in your constituency on these, as well as any other relevant
topics, well before the next General Election expected in 2005.
You should then, depending on the integrity of the candidate of
your choice, feel fairly certain that your view on any subject
being debated in Parliament will more accurately be reflected
by your representative in that assembly.
